ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2013
Challenges in interventional radiology: the pregnant patient.
Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thrombolysis and thrombectomy in a first trimester stroke: expanding the evidence for acute ischemic stroke management in pregnancy. Illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Prospective workup for the estimation of conceptus dose in fluoroscopically guided procedures.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Navigating Pregnancy Testing in Chronic Pain Management for Women of Reproductive Age.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Medicolegal considerations associated with cancer during pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Interventional radiological management of hepatobiliary disorders in pregnancy.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2020Review
- Trans-Radial Embolization of Bleeding Renal Angiomyolipoma in Pregnant 30-Year-Old Female - A Case Report.Journal of radiology case reports · 2019Article
- The parturient in the interventional radiology suite: New frontier in obstetric anaesthesia.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A pregnant patient presenting to interventional radiology (IR) has a different set of needs from any other patient requiring a procedure. Often, the patient's care can be in direct conflict with the growth and development of the fetus, whether it be optimal fluoroscopic imaging, adequate sedation of the mother, or the timing of the needed procedure. Despite the additional risks and complexities associated with pregnancy, IR procedures can be performed safely for the pregnant patient with knowledge of the special and general needs of the pregnant patient, use of acceptable medications and procedures likely to be encountered during pregnancy, in addition to strategies to protect the patient and her fetus from the hazards of radiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.