Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24435941›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014

Respite care for people with dementia and their carers.

Nicola Maayan, Karla Soares-Weiser, Helen Lee

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03354819 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Modified Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Family Caregivers of People With Dementia in Stress Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled113ConditionsCarer Stress Syndrome, DementiaArmsModified MBCT, SIRE on dementia
NCT03578861 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Development and Pilot Testing of a Dementia Specific Respite Care Concept With Scope on Mobility and Couseling.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)Ran2017 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsMobility, Dementia, Counseling, Respite CareArmsDementia related mobility and counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. In-home respite care in dementia: An evolutionary concept analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Comprehensive Assessment of Informal Caregivers of Patients in a Primary Healthcare Home-Care Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicola MaayanEnhance Reviews Ltd, Central Office, Cobweb Buildings, The Lane, Lyford, Wantage, UK, OX12 0EE.
Karla Soares-Weiser
Helen Lee
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaring for someone with dementia can be emotionally and physically demanding. Respite care is any intervention designed to give rest or relief to caregivers. It is not clear what positive and negative effects such care may have on them, or on people with dementia.

objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of respite care for people with dementia and their caregivers, in particular the effect of respite care on rates of institutionalisation. SEARCH

methodsThe trials were identified from a search of ALOIS, the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, using the terms respite* OR daycare OR caregiver* relief. ALOIS contains up-to-date records from all major healthcare databases and many ongoing trial databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing respite care with a control intervention for people with dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors carried out study selection independently and reached a consensus through discussion. Data were extracted by a single review author. The review authors contacted all investigators for methodological details not reported in the text and for additional data for three studies included in the previous version of the review. MAIN

resultsFour trials are now included in the review, with 753 participants. They were different in many ways including the intervention, duration, outcomes and control group so pooling of data was not possible. Overall, the quality of the evidence was rated as very low. Re-analysis of outcomes using data from the published studies found no significant effects of respite care compared to no respite care on any caregiver variable. When respite care was compared to polarity therapy a significant effect was found in favour of polarity therapy for caregiver perceived stress (n = 38, MD 5.80, 95% CI 1.43 to 10.17), but not for other measures of psychological health and other caregiver outcomes. No studies reported evaluable data on outcomes related to the people with dementia. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrent evidence does not demonstrate any benefits or adverse effects from the use of respite care for people with dementia or their caregivers. These results should be treated with caution, however, as they may reflect the lack of high quality research in this area rather than an actual lack of benefit. Given the frequency with which respite care is advocated and provided, well-designed trials are needed in this area.

Indexed as

AgedCaregiversDementiaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespite CareStress, PsychologicalTherapeutic Touch

Identifiers

PMID24435941
PMCPMC11089513
OpenAlexW1564414202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.