SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Respite care for people with dementia and their carers.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of a Modified Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Family Caregivers of People With Dementia in Stress Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Development and Pilot Testing of a Dementia Specific Respite Care Concept With Scope on Mobility and Couseling.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of the Experiences and Support Needs of Informal Caregivers for People Who Have Attempted Suicide or Experienced Suicidal Ideation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions to Prevent or Delay Long-Term Nursing Home Placement for Adults with Impairments-a Systematic Review of Reviews.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Pooled it
- A comprehensive meta-review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on nonpharmacological interventions for informal dementia caregivers.BMC geriatrics · 2020Pooled it
- Cost-Utility Analyses of Interventions for Informal Carers: A Systematic and Critical Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Pooled it
- Key stakeholders' experiences of respite services for people with dementia and their perspectives on respite service development: a qualitative systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2017Pooled it
- Interventions to delay functional decline in people with dementia: a systematic review of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- General practice based psychosocial interventions for supporting carers of people with dementia or stroke: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2016Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a Physical Therapeutic Exercise Programme for Caregivers of Dependent Patients: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial from Spanish Primary Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Models of care across settings supporting ageing in place: a narrative review.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Review
- In-home respite care in dementia: An evolutionary concept analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Review
- Transition for people with dementia from day respite services to permanent residential care: a realist synthesis.BMC health services research · 2024Review
- WHO, WHEN, HOW: a scoping review on flexible at-home respite for informal caregivers of older adults.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Observational
- The day program multiple: Noncoherence and ontological politics.Health (London, England : 1997) · 2024Article
- Examining the Impact of Different Components of Sleep Quality on Anxiety Among Family Carers of People with Dementia.Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology · 2023Article
- Risk factors for nursing home admission among older adults: Analysis of basic movements and activities of daily living.PloS one · 2023Article
- Use of Home Care Services Reduces Care-Related Strain in Long-Distance Caregivers.The Gerontologist · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Assessment of Informal Caregivers of Patients in a Primary Healthcare Home-Care Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Determinants of the need for respite according to the characteristics of informal carers of elderly people at home: results from the 2015 French national survey.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCaring for someone with dementia can be emotionally and physically demanding. Respite care is any intervention designed to give rest or relief to caregivers. It is not clear what positive and negative effects such care may have on them, or on people with dementia.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of respite care for people with dementia and their caregivers, in particular the effect of respite care on rates of institutionalisation. SEARCH
methodsThe trials were identified from a search of ALOIS, the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, using the terms respite* OR daycare OR caregiver* relief. ALOIS contains up-to-date records from all major healthcare databases and many ongoing trial databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing respite care with a control intervention for people with dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors carried out study selection independently and reached a consensus through discussion. Data were extracted by a single review author. The review authors contacted all investigators for methodological details not reported in the text and for additional data for three studies included in the previous version of the review. MAIN
resultsFour trials are now included in the review, with 753 participants. They were different in many ways including the intervention, duration, outcomes and control group so pooling of data was not possible. Overall, the quality of the evidence was rated as very low. Re-analysis of outcomes using data from the published studies found no significant effects of respite care compared to no respite care on any caregiver variable. When respite care was compared to polarity therapy a significant effect was found in favour of polarity therapy for caregiver perceived stress (n = 38, MD 5.80, 95% CI 1.43 to 10.17), but not for other measures of psychological health and other caregiver outcomes. No studies reported evaluable data on outcomes related to the people with dementia. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCurrent evidence does not demonstrate any benefits or adverse effects from the use of respite care for people with dementia or their caregivers. These results should be treated with caution, however, as they may reflect the lack of high quality research in this area rather than an actual lack of benefit. Given the frequency with which respite care is advocated and provided, well-designed trials are needed in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.