Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24435889›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Organised colorectal cancer screening in Lampang Province, Thailand: preliminary results from a pilot implementation programme.

Thiravud Khuhaprema, Suleeporn Sangrajrang, Somkiat Lalitwongsa, Vanida Chokvanitphong, Tawarat Raunroadroong, Tawee Ratanachu-Ek, Richard Muwonge, Eric Lucas, Christopher Wild, Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Current Colorectal Cancer in Thailand.Annals of coloproctology · 2020
    Review
  18. Cancer Prevention in Low-Resource Countries: An Overview of the Opportunity.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2020
    Article
  19. National Cancer Control Program of Thailand.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Thiravud KhuhapremaNational Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suleeporn Sangrajrang
Somkiat Lalitwongsa
Vanida Chokvanitphong
Tawarat Raunroadroong
Tawee Ratanachu-Ek
Richard Muwonge
Eric Lucas
Christopher Wild
Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRNational Cancer Institute of Thailand · THLampang Cancer Hospital · THAmerican Association of Kidney Patients · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most and fifth-most common cancer in men and women, in Thailand. The increasing CRC incidence and mortality can be reduced by screening and treating adenomas and early cancers. A pilot CRC screening programme using immunochemical faecal occult blood testing (iFOBT) and colonoscopy for test-positives were implemented through the routine Government Health Services in Lampang Province, to inform the acceptability, feasibility and scaling-up of screening in Thailand. This report describes the implementation, coverage and performance indicators of this project.

designA target population aged 50-65 years was informed about and invited face to face to undergo CRC screening by community health workers (HWs). The HWs provided faecal sample collection kits and participants brought their samples to one of the primary health units or community hospitals where nurses performed iFOBT. iFOBT-positive persons were referred for colonoscopy at the Lampang cancer hospital, and endoscopic polypectomy/biopsies were performed according to the colonoscopic findings. Those with confirmed CRC received appropriate treatment.

resultsOf the 127 301 target population, 62.9% were screened using iFOBT between April 2011 and November 2012. Participation was higher among women (67.8%) than men (57.8%) and lower in 50-54 year-old persons than in 60-65-year-olds. Of those screened, 873 (1.1%) were found positive; positivity was higher in men (1.2%) than in women (1.0%). To date 627 (72.0%) iFOBT-positive persons have had colonoscopy in which 3.7% had CRC and 30.6% had adenomas.

conclusionsThe successful implementation of the pilot CRC screening with satisfactory process measures indicate the feasibility of scaling-up organised CRC screening through existing health services in Thailand.

Indexed as

AgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationThailandPrimary Care

Identifiers

PMID24435889
PMCPMC3902312
OpenAlexW2101524157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.