Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24435880›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2014

A small noncoding RNA signature found in exosomes of GBM patient serum as a diagnostic tool.

Lorea Manterola, Elizabeth Guruceaga, Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya, Marisol González-Huarriz, Patricia Jauregui, Sonia Tejada, Ricardo Diez-Valle, Victor Segura, Nicolás Samprón, Cristina Barrena and 14 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Lorea ManterolaInstituto Biodonostia and Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain (L.M., N.S., C.B., I.R., A.M., A.L.-M.); Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain (E.G., V.S.); Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.G.P-L., M.G-H., P.J., S.T., R.D.-V., J.R., A.G., E.X., M.M.A.); Polymat, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain (A.A.); IMMA-CIOCC, Fundación Hospital de Madrid, Madrid, Spain (A.A.); Fundación Jimenez-Díaz, Madrid, Spain (J.G.-F.); Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (T.T., I.Z.); Pitié-Salpètriere, Paris, France (S.P., J.Y.D.).
Elizabeth Guruceaga
Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya
Marisol González-Huarriz
Patricia Jauregui
Sonia Tejada
Ricardo Diez-Valle
Victor Segura
Nicolás Samprón
Cristina Barrena
Irune Ruiz
Amaia Agirre
Angel Ayuso
Javier Rodríguez
Alvaro González
Enric Xipell
Ander Matheu
Adolfo López de Munain
Teresa Tuñón
Idoya Zazpe
Jesús García-Foncillas
Sophie Paris
Jean Yves Delattre
Marta M Alonso

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in adults, and its prognosis remains dismal despite intensive research and therapeutic advances. Diagnostic biomarkers would be clinically meaningful to allow for early detection of the tumor and for those cases in which surgery is contraindicated or biopsy results are inconclusive. Recent findings show that GBM cells release microvesicles that contain a select subset of cellular proteins and RNA. The aim of this hypothesis-generating study was to assess the diagnostic potential of miRNAs found in microvesicles isolated from the serum of GBM patients.

methodsTo control disease heterogeneity, we used patients with newly diagnosed GBM. In the discovery stage, PCR-based TaqMan Low Density Arrays followed by individual quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction were used to test the differences in the miRNA expression levels of serum microvesicles among 25 GBM patients and healthy controls paired by age and sex. The detected noncoding RNAs were then validated in another 50 GBM patients.

resultsWe found that the expression levels of 1 small noncoding RNA (RNU6-1) and 2 microRNAs (miR-320 and miR-574-3p) were significantly associated with a GBM diagnosis. In addition, RNU6-1 was consistently an independent predictor of a GBM diagnosis.

conclusionsAltogether our results uncovered a small noncoding RNA signature in microvesicles isolated from GBM patient serum that could be used as a fast and reliable differential diagnostic biomarker.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesExosomesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN320 microRNA, humanMIRN574 microRNA, humanRNA, MessengerbiomarkersdiagnosisexosomesGBMsncRNAs

Identifiers

PMID24435880
PMCPMC3956347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.