ArticleNeuro-oncology2014
A small noncoding RNA signature found in exosomes of GBM patient serum as a diagnostic tool.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
213 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The diagnostic accuracy of exosomes for glioma: A meta-analysis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of extracellular vesicles as non-invasive biomarkers in glioma diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response monitoring.Molecular biology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for Glioma in the Context of Gliomagenesis: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of circulating exosomes in human cancer: A meta-analysis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Pooled it
- Blood Biomarkers of Glioma in Response Assessment Including Pseudoprogression and Other Treatment Effects: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer science · 2018Pooled it
- A comprehensive meta-analysis of circulation miRNAs in glioma as potential diagnostic biomarker.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Circulating miRNAs for glioblastoma monitoring: from biofluid to clinical decision.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Primary CNS Tumors: Bridging Biology, Technology, and Clinical Care.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Exploring CSF microRNA signatures as diagnostic biomarkers in adult-type diffuse gliomas.Non-coding RNA research · 2026Article
- Extracellular Vesicle-Associated miRNAs in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Therapies, and Links to Neurodegeneration.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Differences in MicroRNA Expression in Firefighters Responding to a Train Derailment and Fire in East Palestine, Ohio.Epigenomes · 2026Article
- Biomarkers as Drivers of Innovation in Modern Diagnostics and Therapeutics.Current drug targets · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicle-derived miR21 of non-tumoral origin as early diagnostic marker of glioma.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Plasma Extracellular Vesicles as Liquid Biopsies for Glioblastoma: Biomarkers, Subpopulation Enrichment, and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Microcargos with Megaeffects: A Literature Review of Immunomodulatory, Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Dimensions of Exosomal MicroRNAs in Glioblastoma Multiforme.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Extracellular vesicles: biogenesis mechanism and impacts on tumor immune microenvironment.Journal of biomedical science · 2025Review
- Review
153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in adults, and its prognosis remains dismal despite intensive research and therapeutic advances. Diagnostic biomarkers would be clinically meaningful to allow for early detection of the tumor and for those cases in which surgery is contraindicated or biopsy results are inconclusive. Recent findings show that GBM cells release microvesicles that contain a select subset of cellular proteins and RNA. The aim of this hypothesis-generating study was to assess the diagnostic potential of miRNAs found in microvesicles isolated from the serum of GBM patients.
methodsTo control disease heterogeneity, we used patients with newly diagnosed GBM. In the discovery stage, PCR-based TaqMan Low Density Arrays followed by individual quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction were used to test the differences in the miRNA expression levels of serum microvesicles among 25 GBM patients and healthy controls paired by age and sex. The detected noncoding RNAs were then validated in another 50 GBM patients.
resultsWe found that the expression levels of 1 small noncoding RNA (RNU6-1) and 2 microRNAs (miR-320 and miR-574-3p) were significantly associated with a GBM diagnosis. In addition, RNU6-1 was consistently an independent predictor of a GBM diagnosis.
conclusionsAltogether our results uncovered a small noncoding RNA signature in microvesicles isolated from GBM patient serum that could be used as a fast and reliable differential diagnostic biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.