ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2014
[Recurrence after hernia surgery: complication or natural course?].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07401446 (Comparison of Complication Rates of Onlay vs Sublay Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Complication Rates of Onlay vs Sublay Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal Hernias, Giant Colon Diverticulum, GIST, Intestinal Pneumatosis, Colon Ischemia, Cold Intussusception, Gallstone Ileus, and Foreign Bodies: Our Experience and Literature Review of Incidental Gastrointestinal MDCT Findings.BioMed research international · 2017Review
- Use of double-layer autologous dermal flap in the treatment of recurrent and/or infected incisional hernias: presentation of the surgical technique and the results of 1-year follow-up-a prospective, consecutive cohort study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2016Article
- [Indications for laparoscopic treatment of large incisional hernias].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrence after hernia surgery remains a relevant measure of surgical quality. In order to correctly assess the recurrence rate the surgeon needs to distinguish clinical relevant recurrence, clinically irrelevant recurrence and pseudo-recurrence. Current surgical techniques for inguinal hernia repair using mesh are associated with a low rate of recurrence. Thus, recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery is seen as a surgical complication. Conversely, the recurrence rate for large incisional hernias remains above 10 % and in rare cases a recurrence might represent the natural course. Recurrent hernia can depend on the indication, choice of operation and surgical technique. Therefore, postoperative hernia recurrence probably does not represent the natural course but rather a surgical complication that needs to be prevented by an optimized surgical technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24435830What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.