SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Lack of association of XRCC1 rs1799782 genetic polymorphism with risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic polymorphisms and pancreatic cancer risk: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Histone deacetylase inhibitors VPA and TSA induce apoptosis and autophagy in pancreatic cancer cells.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2017Article
- XRCC1 Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln polymorphisms and risk of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a hospital-based case-control study in China.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2017-04-20Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · · Journal published by SAGE starting in 2017
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that genetic polymorphisms in X-ray repair cross-complementation group 1 (XRCC1) gene could be associated with pancreatic cancer risk. However, previous published studies on the association between XRCC1 rs1799782 genetic polymorphism and pancreatic cancer risk reported inconsistent results. For better understanding of the effects of XRCC1 rs1799782 genetic polymorphism on pancreatic cancer risk, we conducted a meta-analysis of previous published studies by calculating the pooled odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A total of five eligible studies with 1,144 pancreatic cancer cases and 2,925 controls were eventually enrolled. Overall, we found that the XRCC1 rs1799782 genetic polymorphism was not associated with pancreatic cancer risk in total population under all genetic models (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.76-1.63, P = 0.583; CT vs. CC: OR = 1.39, 95% CI 0.92-2.10, P = 0.118; TT/CT vs. CC: OR = 1.39, 95% CI 0.92-2.10, P = 0.121; TT vs. CT/CC: OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.73-1.55, P = 0.743; T vs. C: OR = 1.31, 95% CI 0.93-1.86, P = 0.125). In the subgroup analysis based on ethnicity, there was no statistically significant association between XRCC1 rs1799782 genetic polymorphism and pancreatic cancer risk in Asians/Caucasians under all genetic models (all P values > 0.05). No publication bias was detected in this study. Our meta-analysis suggests that the XRCC1 rs1799782 genetic polymorphism is not significantly associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Considering the limited sample size and ethnicity enrolled in this meta-analysis, further larger scaled studies are needed to provide a more precise estimation on the association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.