Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24435507›Full record

Trial reportPediatric cardiology2014

Comparison of oral ibuprofen with oral indomethacin for PDA closure in Indian preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial.

Sanju Yadav, Sheetal Agarwal, Arti Maria, Ajay Dudeja, N K Dubey, Puneet Anand, Dinesh Kumar Yadav

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Late Acetaminophen Therapy for Patent Ductus Arteriosus in the Preterm Neonate.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sanju YadavDepartment of Pediatrics, PGIMER & Associated Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sheetal Agarwal
Arti Maria
Ajay Dudeja
N K Dubey
Puneet Anand
Dinesh Kumar Yadav

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral ibuprofen is being used as an alternative to indomethacin in medical management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), but limited data exist on oral efficacy of these drugs for PDA closure in India. To assess and compare the efficacy of oral ibuprofen and oral indomethacin for PDA closure in preterm Indian neonates, we designed a randomized controlled study on clinically diagnosed and echocardiographically confirmed hemodynamically significant PDA in preterm neonates. Patients were assigned to receive either oral ibuprofen at a dosage of 10, 5, 5 mg/kg every 24 h or three doses of oral indomethacin (0.20-0.25 mg/kg every 24 h) starting on the third day of life or when diagnosed. A second course of ibuprofen/indomethacin was given, if PDA failed to close within 48 h after the first course. Patients were monitored for complications like oliguria, bleeding, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, oxygen dependency, and gastrointestinal side effects. The baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. Of the 83 children enrolled, 57.8 % received oral ibuprofen and 42.1 % received oral indomethacin. The overall closure rate of PDA was 60 and 65.7 % in the ibuprofen and indomethacin groups, respectively. Closure rate was significantly higher when the drugs were administered at an early postnatal age (<8 days) (83.3 % [p = 0.02] in the indomethacin group and 75 % [p = 0.03] in the ibuprofen group) in neonates >28 weeks (ibuprofen group 66.7 % [p = 0.02]; indomethacin group 65.5 % [p = 0.04]) and in babies with birth weight >1,000 g (ibuprofen group 62.2 %; indomethacin group 70 % [p = 0.04 in both groups]). Complications were similar in both groups. The efficacy of both drugs was similar. Poor closure in our study could be because of genetic differences in pharmacokinetics of drug metabolism in the Indian population. Regimens with higher doses or increased duration of treatment may increase the frequency of closure. Studies with larger numbers of subjects with evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters are therefore required.

Indexed as

Administration, OralCyclooxygenase InhibitorsDuctus Arteriosus, PatentFemaleHumansIbuprofenIndiaIndomethacinInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleTreatment OutcomeCyclooxygenase InhibitorsIbuprofenIndomethacin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.