Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24435222›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015

Mobile-bearing prosthesis and intraoperative gap balancing are not predictors of superior knee flexion: a prospective randomized study.

Yukihide Minoda, Hiroyoshi Iwaki, Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi, Taku Yoshida, Shigekazu Mizokawa, Maki Itokazu, Hiroaki Nakamura

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Clinical outcome of increased flexion gap after total knee arthroplasty. Can controlled gap imbalance improve knee flexion?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  6. No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Review
  7. [Research progress of larger flexion gap than extension gap in total knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yukihide MinodaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan, yminoda@msic.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp.
Hiroyoshi Iwaki
Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi
Taku Yoshida
Shigekazu Mizokawa
Maki Itokazu
Hiroaki Nakamura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRange of motion is a crucial measure of the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Gap balancing technique and mobile-bearing prosthesis can improve postoperative range of motion. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that are predictive of the postoperative range of motion.

methodsA total of 94 knees with varus osteoarthritis were prospectively randomized to receive either a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing or a posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing prosthesis. All preoperative and postoperative protocols and operative techniques were identical in the two groups. Extension and flexion joint gaps were measured using a tensor device during the operation. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the best predictors of the knee flexion angle 2 years after the operation. The independent variables were type of prosthesis (mobile-bearing or fixed-bearing), difference between flexion and extension joint gaps (mm), age, gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative and intraoperative knee flexion angles, change in posterior condylar offset, and posterior tilt of the tibial plateau.

resultsThe mean difference between flexion and extension joint gaps was 0.8 ± 1.3 (mean ± SD) mm for mobile-bearing and 0.8 ± 1.9 mm for fixed-bearing prosthesis. The mean flexion angle for mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing groups was 120 ± 16° and 116 ± 20° preoperatively (n.s.), 142 ± 9° and 141 ± 12° intraoperatively (n.s.), and 129 ± 10° and 128 ± 13° at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.773), respectively. Predictors were identified in the following three categories: (1) preoperative flexion angle, (2) intraoperative radiographic flexion angle, and (3) BMI (R = 0.603, p < 0.001).

conclusionsMobile-bearing prosthesis and optimal gap balancing did not result in superior postoperative flexion angle. Better preoperative and intraoperative flexion angles and lower BMI were the significant predictors for better postoperative flexion angle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level I.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleGenu VarumHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularTibia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.