ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2015
[Geriatric complex treatment of proximal femoral fractures? Who profits the most?].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of orthogeriatric care models and association with mortality and health-economic outcomes in patients with hip fractures: a retrospective cohort study from Germany.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- [Organizational and hospital structure for the integrated care of orthogeriatic patients].Der Orthopade · 2022Review
- [Elderly trauma patients with proximal femur fractures : Statistical evaluation of regular process data from a trauma center for the elderly].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Article
- [Interdisciplinary treatment in geriatric traumatology from the trauma surgeons' perspective : Results of a survey in Germany].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeriatric complex treatment (GCT) is a new type of early rehabilitative care. The main goal is to maintain personal autonomy. GCT includes 21 treatments by physio-, occupational and speech therapists, accompanied by specialized nurses. The aim of this study was to investigate how elderly patients benefit from the GCT after hip fractures (HF). PATIENTS AND
methodsIn all, 124 patients [≥70 years; 50 patients underwent GCT, 74 underwent standard traumatologic care (STC)] after operative treatment for HF were included. Cognitive impairment was diagnosed in 46% of GCT patients and 70% were classified as ASA III. In the STC group, 23% were cognitively impaired and 50% were classified ASA III.
resultsSignificantly more patients of the GCT group were both cognitively impaired and classified as ASA III. Among the cognitively impaired, the STC group reached a median of 20 points on the Barthel index, while the GCT group reached 60 points.
conclusionThe GCT patients in our study were more likely to be dependent on care and have cognitive deficits. Only cognitively impaired patients were shown to benefit from GCT. In the remaining patients no difference was found, thus, only cognitively impaired patients currently undergo GCT at our clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.