Trial reportDer Unfallchirurg2015
[Midterm results following denervation of the ankle].
Trial report in Der Unfallchirurg, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The sensory innervation pattern of the ankle: a systematic review.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Pooled it
- Is denervation surgery possible in the treatment of hallux rigidus? An anatomic study of cadaveric specimens.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplications related to arthrodesis of the ankle or total ankle replacement require a critical assessment of the indication. Using denervation of the ankle, we have the possibility to delay the above-named surgical treatment for a number of years. The aim of this follow-up study was to review the results of ankle denervation after several years.
methodsWithin a follow-up examination, we were able to evaluate the results of 45 patients an average of 102 months following ankle denervation.
resultsA total of 82.2% of patients indicated an improvement of pain for an average of 60.9 months; 71.1% of patients reported that the operation was worthwhile. The AOFAS score improved from an average 37.9 (range 26-68) preoperatively to 55.6 (range 24-84) at follow-up.
conclusionsAnkle denervation can achieve good ankle pain reduction in the treatment of ankle arthrosis. Denervation should be considered a long-term treatment concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24435100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.