Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24434773›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2014

Separating analgesia from reward within the ventral tegmental area.

E Schifirneţ, S E Bowen, G S Borszcz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E SchifirneţBehavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
S E BowenBehavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
G S BorszczBehavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. Electronic address: borszcz@wayne.edu.
Wayne State University · US

Funding

EMOTION OF PAIN: A NEUROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSISR01NS045720 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BORSZCZ, GEORGE S. · 2003 to 2006
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS-045720NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of the dopaminergic mesolimbic reward circuit that originates in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) is postulated to preferentially suppress emotional responses to noxious stimuli, and presumably contributes to the addictive liability of strong analgesics. VTA dopamine neurons are activated via cholinergic afferents and microinjection of carbachol (cholinergic agonist) into VTA is rewarding. Here, we evaluated regional differences within VTA in the capacity of carbachol to suppress rats' affective response to pain (vocalization afterdischarges, VADs) and to support conditioned place preference (CPP) learning. As carbachol is a non-specific agonist, muscarinic and nicotinic receptor involvement was assessed by administering atropine (muscarinic antagonist) and mecamylamine (nicotinic antagonist) into VTA prior to carbachol treatment. Unilateral injections of carbachol (4μg) into anterior VTA (aVTA) and posterior VTA (pVTA) suppressed VADs and supported CPP; whereas, injections into midVTA failed to effect either VADs or CPP. These findings corroborate the hypothesis that the neural substrates underlying affective analgesia and reward overlap. However, the extent of the overlap was only partial. Whereas both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors contributed to carbachol-induced affective analgesia in aVTA, only muscarinic receptors mediated the analgesic action of carbachol in pVTA. The rewarding effects of carbachol are mediated by the activation of both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in both aVTA and pVTA. The results indicate that analgesia and reward are mediated by separate cholinergic mechanisms within pVTA. Nicotinic receptor antagonism within pVTA failed to attenuate carbachol-induced analgesia, but prevented carbachol-induced reward. As addictive liability of analgesics stem from their rewarding properties, the present findings suggest that these processes can be neuropharmacologically separated within pVTA.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaRewardAnimalsAtropineCarbacholCholinergic AgonistsMaleMecamylamineMuscarinic AntagonistsNicotinic AntagonistsPain ThresholdRatsRats, Long-EvansVentral Tegmental AreaAtropineCarbacholCholinergic AgonistsMecamylamineMuscarinic AntagonistsNicotinic Antagonistsaddictionanalgesiamuscarinicnicotinicpainreward

Identifiers

PMID24434773
PMCPMC4066888
OpenAlexW2085161130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.