Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24434717›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacological and toxicological methods

Estimation of ligand affinity constants for receptor states in functional studies involving the allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors: implications for ligand bias.

Frederick J Ehlert, Michael T Griffin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Functional studies cast light on receptor states.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frederick J EhlertDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617-4625, United States; Crean School of Health and Life Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, United States. Electronic address: fjehlert@uci.edu.
Michael T GriffinDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617-4625, United States; Crean School of Health and Life Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, United States.
Chapman University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Agonist Activity at G Protein Coupled ReceptorsR01GM069829 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI EHLERT, FRED J · 2005 to 2008
$931k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe affinity constants of a ligand for active and inactive states of a receptor ultimately determine its capacity to activate downstream signaling events. In this report, we describe a reverse-engineering strategy for estimating these microscopic constants.

methodsOur approach involves analyzing responses measured downstream in the signaling pathway of a G protein-coupled receptor under conditions of allosteric modulation and reduced receptor expression or partial receptor inactivation. The analysis also yields estimates of the isomerization constant of the unoccupied receptor, the sensitivity constant of the signaling pathway, and the more empirical parameters of the receptor population including the observed affinities and efficacies of allosteric and orthosteric ligands - including inverse agonists - and the efficacy of the unoccupied receptor (i.e., constitutive activity). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We validate our approach with an analytical proof and by analysis of simulated data. We also use our method to analyze data from the literature. We show that the values of the microscopic constants of orthosteric and allosteric ligands are constant regardless of the allosteric interaction and the nature of the receptor-signaling pathway as long as the same active state mediates the response. Our analysis is useful for quantifying probe-dependent allosteric interactions and the selectivity of agonists for different signaling pathways. Knowing the isomerization constant and sensitivity constant of a signaling pathway in a given cell line or tissue preparation enables future investigators to estimate the affinity constants of agonists for receptor states simply through analysis of their concentration-response curves. Our approach also provides a means of validating in silico estimates of ligand affinity for crystal structures of active and inactive states of the receptor.

Indexed as

Drug Inverse AgonismAllosteric RegulationComputer SimulationHumansLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAffinity modulationAgonist-biasAllosterismConstitutive activityEfficacy modulationLigand-biasMonod-Wyman-ChangeuxMuscarinic receptorProbe-dependenceReceptor states

Identifiers

PMID24434717
PMCPMC4028174
OpenAlexW1516856804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.