Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24434506›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2014

Cell lines.

Lucy Cherbas, Lei Gong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The utility ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CryoET shows cofilactin filaments inside the microtubule lumen.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AdaptingG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Circadian and Sleep Metabolomics Across Species.Journal of molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Generating and working with Drosophila cell cultures: Current challenges and opportunities.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  20. Thawing, Culturing, and Cryopreserving Drosophila Cell Lines.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucy CherbasDrosophila Genomics Resource Center, Indiana University, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: lcherbas@cgb.indiana.edu.
Lei GongDrosophila Genomics Resource Center, Indiana University, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: lgong@cgb.indiana.edu.

Funding

DROSOPHILA GENOMICS RESOURCE CENTERP40OD010949 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Zelhof · 2012 to 2026
$9.4M
NIH HHS 2P40OD010949NIH HHS P40 OD010949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review the properties and uses of cell lines in Drosophila research, emphasizing the variety of lines, the large body of genomic and transcriptional data available for many of the lines, and the variety of ways the lines have been used to provide tools for and insights into the developmental, molecular, and cell biology of Drosophila and mammals.

Indexed as

Cell LineAnimalsDevelopmental BiologyDrosophilaGenomicsCell linesDrosophilaTranscriptomeTransformation

Identifiers

PMID24434506
PMCPMC4048767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.