Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24434327›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2013

Allogenicity & immunogenicity in regenerative stem cell therapy.

Dominique Charron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Stem cells and pain.World journal of stem cells · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Potency of Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells for Renal Lineage Differentiation.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex differences in stroke therapies.Journal of neuroscience research · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dominique CharronLaboratoire "Jean Dausset" - Laboratoire d'Immunologie et d'Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, CIB-HOG, AP-HP & INSERM UMRS 940, Institut Universitaire d'Hématologie, Université Paris-Diderot ,1, Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of regenerative medicine relies in part on the capacity of stem cells to differentiate into specialized cell types and reconstitute tissues and organs. The origin of the stem cells matters. While autologous cells were initially the preferred ones the need for "off the shelf" cells is becoming prevalent. These cells will be immediately available and they originate from young non diseased individuals. However their allogenicity can be viewed as a limitation to their use. Recent works including our own show that allogenicity of stem cell can be viewed as on one hand detrimental leading to their elimination and on the other hand beneficial through a paracrine effect that can induce a local tissue regenerative effect from endogenous stem cells. Also their immune modulatory capacity can be harnessed to favor regeneration. Therefore the immune phenotype of stem cells is an important criteria to be considered before their clinical use. Immuno monitoring of the consequences of their in vivo injection needs to be taken into account. Transplantation immunology knowledge will be instrumental to enable the development of safe personalized regenerative stem cell therapy.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression RegulationHLA-A AntigensHLA-DR AntigensHumansRegenerative MedicineStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, HomologousHLA-A AntigensHLA-DR Antigens

Identifiers

PMID24434327
PMCPMC3928705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.