Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24434229›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2014

Outreach and integration programs to promote family planning in the extended postpartum period.

Sarita Sonalkar, Sheila Mody, Mary E Gaffield

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Home visiting for first-time mothers and subsequent pregnancy spacing.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarita SonalkarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA. Electronic address: sarita.sonalkar@bmc.org.
Sheila ModyDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Mary E GaffieldDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Boston University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

UC San Diego Womens Reproductive Health Research ProgramK12HD001259 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CYNTHIA GYAMFI-BANNERMAN · 1999 to 2026
$9.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD00 1259NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001259World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWHO recommends birth spacing to improve the health of the mother and child. One strategy to facilitate birth spacing is to improve the use of family planning during the first year postpartum.

objectivesTo determine from the literature the effectiveness of postpartum family-planning programs and to identify research gaps. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for articles published between database inception and March 2013. Abstracts of conference presentations, dissertations, and unpublished studies were also considered. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published studies with birth spacing or contraceptive use outcomes were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard abstract forms and the US Preventive Services Task Force grading system were used to summarize and assess the quality of the evidence. MAIN

resultsThirty-four studies were included. Prenatal care, home visitation programs, and educational interventions were associated with improved family-planning outcomes, but should be further studied in low-resource settings. Mother-infant care integration, multidisciplinary interventions, and cash transfer/microfinance interventions need further investigation.

conclusionsProgrammatic interventions may improve birth spacing and contraceptive uptake. Larger well-designed studies in international settings are needed to determine the most effective ways to deliver family-planning interventions.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansPatient Education as TopicPregnancyPrenatal CareProgram DevelopmentBirth spacingFamily planningPostpartum periodProgrammatic interventionsRapid repeat birthSystematic reviewTeen pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID24434229
PMCPMC4040294
OpenAlexW2013377593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.