Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24434038›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2013

Gynecologic tumors: how to communicate imaging results to the surgeon.

Stefania Rizzo, Giuseppina Calareso, Federica De Maria, Vanna Zanagnolo, Roberta Lazzari, Agnese Cecconi, Massimo Bellomi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Endometrial cancer: an overview of novelties in treatment and related imaging keypoints for local staging.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefania RizzoDepartment of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppina CalaresoDepartment of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Federica De MariaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, via A.di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy.
Vanna ZanagnoloDepartment of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Roberta LazzariDepartment of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Agnese CecconiDepartment of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Massimo BellomiDepartment of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy; Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, via A.di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynecologic cancers are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for female patients, with an estimated 88,750 new cancer cases and 29,520 deaths in the United States in 2012. To offer the best treatment options to patients it is important that the radiologist, surgeon, radiation oncologist, and gynecologic oncologist work together with a multidisciplinary approach. Using the available diagnostic imaging modalities, the radiologist must give appropriate information to the surgeon in order to plan the best surgical approach and its timing.

Indexed as

CommunicationFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm InvasivenessPositron-Emission TomographyPreoperative CareTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID24434038
PMCPMC3894699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.