Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24434036›Full record

ReviewTrends in plant science2014

Advanced imaging techniques for the study of plant growth and development.

Rosangela Sozzani, Wolfgang Busch, Edgar P Spalding, Philip N Benfey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phytochemical Profiling and Toxicological Evaluation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Plant chemical biology: are we meeting the promise?Frontiers in plant science · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosangela SozzaniDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Wolfgang BuschGregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Edgar P SpaldingDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Philip N BenfeyDepartment of Biology, Duke Center for Systems Biology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: philip.benfey@duke.edu.

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF ROOT MORPHOGENESISR01GM043778 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI BENFEY, PHILIP N · 1991 to 2017
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043778NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM043778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of imaging methodologies are being used to collect data for quantitative studies of plant growth and development from living plants. Multi-level data, from macroscopic to molecular, and from weeks to seconds, can be acquired. Furthermore, advances in parallelized and automated image acquisition enable the throughput to capture images from large populations of plants under specific growth conditions. Image-processing capabilities allow for 3D or 4D reconstruction of image data and automated quantification of biological features. These advances facilitate the integration of imaging data with genome-wide molecular data to enable systems-level modeling.

Indexed as

Plant DevelopmentSystems BiologyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, BiologicalPhenotypePlantsTime Factorsimaging techniquesplant growth and developmentsystems-level modeling

Identifiers

PMID24434036
PMCPMC4008707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.