Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24433577›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2014

The genome and proteome of Serratia bacteriophage η which forms unstable lysogens.

Jenna M Denyes, Peter J Krell, Richard A Manderville, Hans-Wolfgang Ackermann, Yi-Min She, Andrew M Kropinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification, Characterization, and Genomic Analysis of NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jenna M Denyes
Peter J Krell
Richard A Manderville
Hans-Wolfgang Ackermann
Yi-Min She
Andrew M KropinskiDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. kropinsk@queensu.ca.
University of Guelph · CAChinese Academy of Sciences · CNETH Zurich · CHPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerratia marcescens phage η is a temperate unclassified member of the Siphoviridae which had been reported as containing hypermodified guanine residues.

methodsThe DNA was characterized by enzymatic digestion followed by HPLC analysis of the nucleoside composition, and by DNA sequencing and proteomic analysis. Its ability to form stable lysogens and integrate was also investigated.

resultsEnzymatic digestion and HPLC analysis revealed phage η DNA did not contain modified bases. The genome sequence of this virus, determined using pyrosequencing, is 42,724 nucleotides in length with a mol% GC of 49.9 and is circularly permuted. Sixty-nine putative CDSs were identified of which 19 encode novel proteins. While seven close genetic relatives were identified, they shared sequence similarity with only genes 40 to 69 of the phage η genome, while gp1 to gp39 shared no conserved relationship. The structural proteome, determined by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry, revealed seven unique proteins. This phage forms very unstable lysogens with its host S. marcescens.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralLysogenyBacteriophagesDNA, ViralElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMass SpectrometryMolecular Sequence DataProteomeSequence Analysis, DNASerratia marcescensViral ProteinsVirus IntegrationDNA, ViralProteomeViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24433577
PMCPMC3918226
OpenAlexW2136668267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.