Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24433488›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2014

Functional and genetic characterization of clinical malignant hyperthermia crises: a multi-centre study.

Werner Klingler, Sebastian Heiderich, Thierry Girard, Elvira Gravino, James Ja Heffron, Stephan Johannsen, Karin Jurkat-Rott, Henrik Rüffert, Frank Schuster, Marc Snoeck and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phosphorylation of RYR1 at SerScience signaling · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Neuromuscular symptoms in patients withBrain communications · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Malignant hyperthermia in severe COVID-19: 2 case reports.Emergency and critical care medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The current status of malignant hyperthermia.Journal of biomedical research · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Werner KlinglerDepartment of Neuroanesthesiology, Ulm University, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str, 2, Günzburg 89312, Germany. werner.klingler@uni-ulm.de.
Sebastian Heiderich
Thierry Girard
Elvira Gravino
James Ja Heffron
Stephan Johannsen
Karin Jurkat-Rott
Henrik Rüffert
Frank Schuster
Marc Snoeck
Vincenzo Sorrentino
Vincenzo Tegazzin
Frank Lehmann-Horn
University Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DECanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLHelios Park-Klinikum Leipzig · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant hyperthermia (MH) is a rare pharmacogenetic disorder which is characterized by life-threatening metabolic crises during general anesthesia. Classical triggering substances are volatile anesthetics and succinylcholine (SCh). The molecular basis of MH is excessive release of Ca2+ in skeletal muscle principally by a mutated ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1). To identify factors explaining the variable phenotypic presentation and complex pathomechanism, we analyzed proven MH events in terms of clinical course, muscle contracture, genetic factors and pharmocological triggers.

methodsIn a multi-centre study including seven European MH units, patients with a history of a clinical MH episode confirmed by susceptible (MHS) or equivocal (MHE) in vitro contracture tests (IVCT) were investigated. A test result is considered to be MHE if the muscle specimens develop pathological contractures in response to only one of the two test substances, halothane or caffeine. Crises were evaluated using a clinical grading scale (CGS), results of IVCT and genetic screening. The effects of SCh and volatile anesthetics on Ca2+ release from sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) were studied in vitro.

resultsA total of 200 patients met the inclusion criteria. Two MH crises (1%) were triggered by SCh (1 MHS, 1 MHE), 18% by volatile anesthetics and 81% by a combination of both. Patients were 70% male and 50% were younger than 12 years old. Overall, CGS was in accord with IVCT results. Crises triggered by enflurane had a significantly higher CGS compared to halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane. Of the 200 patients, 103 carried RyR1 variants, of which 14 were novel. CGS varied depending on the location of the mutation within the RyR1 gene. In contrast to volatile anesthetics, SCh did not evoke Ca2+ release from isolated rat SR vesicles.

conclusionsAn MH event could depend on patient-related risk factors such as male gender, young age and causative RyR1 mutations as well as on the use of drugs lowering the threshold of myoplasmic Ca2+ release. SCh might act as an accelerant by promoting unspecific Ca2+ influx via the sarcolemma and indirect RyR1 activation. Most MH crises develop in response to the combined administration of SCh and volatile anesthetics.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMalignant HyperthermiaMiddle AgedMutationRyanodine Receptor Calcium Release ChannelSuccinylcholineYoung AdultRyanodine Receptor Calcium Release ChannelSuccinylcholine

Identifiers

PMID24433488
PMCPMC3896768
OpenAlexW2139746402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.