Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24433474›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2014

Educational level, prevalence of hysterectomy, and age at amenorrhoea: a cross-sectional analysis of 9536 women from six population-based cohort studies in Germany.

Andreas Stang, Alexander Kluttig, Susanne Moebus, Henry Völzke, Klaus Berger, Karin Halina Greiser, Doris Stöckl, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Christa Meisinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Menopausal Age and Chronic Diseases in Elderly Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Northeast China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  13. Depression Following Hysterectomy and the Influencing Factors.Iranian Red Crescent medical journal · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas StangInstitut für Klinische Epidemiologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str, 8, 06112 Halle (Saale) Halle, Germany. andreas.stang@uk-halle.de.
Alexander Kluttig
Susanne Moebus
Henry Völzke
Klaus Berger
Karin Halina Greiser
Doris Stöckl
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Christa Meisinger
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEInstitut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversität Greifswald · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHysterectomy prevalence has been shown to vary by education level. Hysterectomy influences age at amenorrhoea. The aim of this study was to examine these associations in Germany within population-based data sets.

methodsBaseline assessments in six population-based cohorts took place from 1997 through 2006 and included 9,548 women aged 20-84 years. All studies assessed hysterectomy history, school and professional degrees. Degrees were categorized into three levels each. Adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated.

resultsPrevalences were higher in West Germany than East Germany, increased by age, and leveled off starting at 55-64 years. The age- and study-adjusted prevalence ratio (lowest versus highest school level) was 2.61 (95% CI: 1.28-5.30), 1.48 (95% CI: 1.21-1.81), and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.80-1.28) for women aged 20-45, 45-64, and 65 and more years respectively. The estimated adjusted prevalence ratios per one unit decrement of the educational qualification score (range 1 = lowest, 8 = highest) were 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02-1.64), 1.08 (95% CI: 1.04-1.12), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93-1.03) for women aged 20-44, 45-64, and 65-84 years respectively. Age at amenorrhoea was on average 6.2 years lower (43.5 years versus 49.7 years) among women with a history of hysterectomy than those without.

conclusionsLower educational level was associated with a higher hysterectomy prevalence among women aged 20-64 years. Several mediators associated with educational level and hysterectomy including women's disease risk, women's treatment preference, and women's access to uterus-preserving treatment may explain this association. At population level, hysterectomy decreases the age of amenorrhoea on average by 6.2 years.

Indexed as

MenopauseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleGermanyHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPatient PreferenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24433474
PMCPMC3898063
OpenAlexW2089495183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.