ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2014
Influence of covariate distribution on the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models in paediatric research.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Tideglusib in Congenital and Childhood Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1: Influence of Demographic and Clinical Factors on Systemic Exposure.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Oral Viscous Budesonide in Paediatric Patients with Eosinophilic Oesophagitis in Repaired Oesophageal Atresia.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Generalizability of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes for Diabetes Control Resulting From Bariatric Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Common Selfcare Indications of Pain Medications in Children.Paediatric drugs · 2023Review
- Improving clinical paediatric research and learning from COVID-19: recommendations by the Conect4Children expert advice group.Pediatric research · 2022Article
- β-lactam precision dosing in critically ill children: Current state and knowledge gaps.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Can Population Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics be Extrapolated? Implications of External Evaluations.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2021Review
- Effect of Age-Related Factors on the Pharmacokinetics of Lamotrigine and Potential Implications for Maintenance Dose Optimisation in Future Clinical Trials.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2018Article
- How to optimise drug study design: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies introduced to paediatricians.The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology · 2017Review
- Generating Virtual Patients by Multivariate and Discrete Re-Sampling Techniques.Pharmaceutical research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe accuracy of model-based predictions often reported in paediatric research has not been thoroughly characterized. The aim of this exercise is therefore to evaluate the role of covariate distributions when a pharmacokinetic model is used for simulation purposes.
methodsPlasma concentrations of a hypothetical drug were simulated in a paediatric population using a pharmacokinetic model in which body weight was correlated with clearance and volume of distribution. Two subgroups of children were then selected from the overall population according to a typical study design, in which pre-specified body weight ranges (10-15 kg and 30-40 kg) were used as inclusion criteria. The simulated data sets were then analyzed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. Model performance was assessed by comparing the accuracy of AUC predictions obtained for each subgroup, based on the model derived from the overall population and by extrapolation of the model parameters across subgroups.
resultsOur findings show that systemic exposure as well as pharmacokinetic parameters cannot be accurately predicted from the pharmacokinetic model obtained from a population with a different covariate range from the one explored during model building. Predictions were accurate only when a model was used for prediction in a subgroup of the initial population.
conclusionsIn contrast to current practice, the use of pharmacokinetic modelling in children should be limited to interpolations within the range of values observed during model building. Furthermore, the covariate point estimate must be kept in the model even when predictions refer to a subset different from the original population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.