ArticleFrontiers in oncology2014
What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.Journal of human genetics · 2016Pooled it
- Effects of personal cancer history and genomic risk information on mothers' psychological adaptation to inherited breast/ovarian cancer syndrome.Psychology, health & medicine · 2025Article
- Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Factors Associated with the Uptake of Genetic Testing for Cancer Risks: A Pathway Analysis Using the Health Information National Trends Survey Data.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Study protocol: the Australian genetics and life insurance moratorium-monitoring the effectiveness and response (A-GLIMMER) project.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020Article
- Massively Parallel Sequencing for Rare Genetic Disorders: Potential and Pitfalls.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
- Psychosocial, attitudinal, and demographic correlates of cancer-related germline genetic testing in the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey.Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- Breast Cancer Genetics Knowledge and Testing Intentions among Nigerian Professional Women.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- Precision medicine: opportunities, possibilities, and challenges for patients and providers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Genetic knowledge and attitudes of parents of children with congenital heart defects.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe advent of human genome project has lead to genetic tests that identify high-risk states for certain cancers. Many are privately marketed on the Internet. Despite the availability of tests, limited data has evaluated factors that lead to test uptake. The aim of the present study was to explore the attitudes of a cohort of new mothers toward uptake of a genetic cancer test with a 50% predictive value of cancer.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was undertaken. The project targeted women who had recently given birth at an Australian tertiary referral hospital. Women were asked about a theoretical blood test that detected an increased risk for the development of cancer. Attitudes and knowledge questionnaires were completed.
resultsOf 232 consecutive women approached, 32 declined, giving a response rate of 86.2%. Only 63 (31.5%) women stated they would have the test. Absence of religious belief, higher level of education, better knowledge of terms used in genetics, an absence of concern over emotional, employment, and insurance discrimination, and previous acceptance of Down syndrome screening in pregnancy were each associated with significantly higher rate of test uptake in univariate analysis (all p < 0.03). In multivariate analysis, a lack of concern over discrimination and a history of having accepted Down syndrome screening in the previous pregnancy remained significantly associated with test uptake (all p < 0.0001).
conclusionConcern over discrimination and having made a prior decision to have genetic testing were the principal factors associated with decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.