Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24432199›Full record

ArticlePsychological test and assessment modeling2013

Extension of an iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory approach to detect and account for differential item functioning in longitudinal data.

Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Laura E Gibbons, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Paul K Crane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological test and assessment modeling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: definition, theory, and a revised model.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shubhabrata MukherjeeUniversity of Washington, USA.
Laura E GibbonsUniversity of Washington, USA.
Elizabeth KristjanssonUniversity of Ottawa, Canada.
Paul K CraneUniversity of Washington, USA.

Funding

THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF INTRA-NASAL INSULIN DETEMIRP50AG005136 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAYADEY, SUMAN · 1985 to 2019
$57.2M
Improving Cognitive Outcome Precision & Responsiveness with Modern PsychometricsR01AG029672 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, PAUL K · 2007 to 2021
$7.0M
ENGLISH AND SPANISH ASSESSMENT OF COGNITION IN ELDERLYR01AG010220 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MUNGAS, DAN M. · 1992 to 2012
$4.5M
Conference on Advanced Psychometric Methods in Cognitive Aging ResearchR13AG030995 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MUNGAS, DAN M. · 2008 to 2022
$620k
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005136NIA NIH HHS R01 AG010220NIA NIH HHS R01 AG029672NIA NIH HHS R13 AG030995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many constructs are measured using multi-item data collection instruments. Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when construct-irrelevant covariates interfere with the relationship between construct levels and item responses. DIF assessment is an active area of research, and several techniques are available to identify and account for DIF in cross-sectional settings. Many studies include data collected from individuals over time; yet appropriate methods for identifying and accounting for items with DIF in these settings are not widely available. We present an approach to this problem and apply it to longitudinal Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) data from English speakers in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. We analyzed 3MS items for DIF with respect to sex, birth cohort and education. First, we focused on cross-sectional data from a subset of Canadian Study of Health and Aging participants who had complete data at all three data collection periods. We performed cross-sectional DIF analyses at each time point using an iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory (OLR/IRT) framework. We found that item-level findings differed at the three time points. We then developed and applied an approach to detecting and accounting for DIF using longitudinal data in which covariation within individuals over time is accounted for by clustering on person. We applied this approach to data for the "entire" dataset of English speaking participants including people who later dropped out or died. Accounting for longitudinal DIF modestly attenuated differences between groups defined by educational attainment. We conclude with a discussion of further directions for this line of research.

Indexed as

differential item functioningitem response theoryordinal logistic regression

Identifiers

PMID24432199
PMCPMC3890358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.