Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24432198›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2013

Succession of the turkey gastrointestinal bacterial microbiome related to weight gain.

Jessica L Danzeisen, Alamanda J Calvert, Sally L Noll, Brian McComb, Julie S Sherwood, Catherine M Logue, Timothy J Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Potential for the development ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  14. Impact ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Temporal dynamics of the chicken mycobiome.Frontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica L DanzeisenDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota , Saint Paul, MN , USA.
Alamanda J CalvertDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Food, Agriculture and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota , Saint Paul, MN , USA.
Sally L NollDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Food, Agriculture and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota , Saint Paul, MN , USA.
Brian McCombWillmar Poultry Company , Willmar, MN , USA.
Julie S SherwoodDepartment of Veterinary and Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University , Fargo, ND , USA.
Catherine M LogueDepartment of Veterinary and Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University , Fargo, ND , USA ; Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University , Ames, IA , USA.
Timothy J JohnsonDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota , Saint Paul, MN , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of concerns related to the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture, antibiotic-free alternatives are greatly needed to prevent disease and promote animal growth. One of the current challenges facing commercial turkey production in Minnesota is difficulty obtaining flock average weights typical of the industry standard, and this condition has been coined "Light Turkey Syndrome" or LTS. This condition has been identified in Minnesota turkey flocks for at least five years, and it has been observed that average flock body weights never approach their genetic potential. However, a single causative agent responsible for these weight reductions has not been identified despite numerous efforts to do so. The purpose of this study was to identify the bacterial community composition within the small intestines of heavy and light turkey flocks using 16S rRNA sequencing, and to identify possible correlations between microbiome and average flock weight. This study also sought to define the temporal succession of bacteria occurring in the turkey ileum. Based upon 2.7 million sequences across nine different turkey flocks, dominant operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified and compared between the flocks studied. OTUs that were associated with heavier weight flocks included those with similarity to Candidatus division Arthromitus and Clostridium bartlettii, while these flocks had decreased counts of several Lactobacillus species compared to lighter weight flocks. The core bacterial microbiome succession in commercial turkeys was also defined. Several defining markers of microbiome succession were identified, including the presence or abundance of Candidatus division Arthromitus, Lactobacillus aviarius, Lactobacillus ingluviei, Lactobacillus salivarius, and Clostridium bartlettii. Overall, the succession of the ileum bacterial microbiome in commercial turkeys proceeds in a predictable manner. Efforts to prevent disease and promote growth in the absence of antibiotics could involve target dominant bacteria identified in the turkey ileum that are associated with increased weight gain.

Indexed as

16SBacteriaCandidatus ArthromitusGastrointestinalLactobacillusMicrobiomePoultrySegmented filamentous bacteriaSuccessionTurkeys

Identifiers

PMID24432198
PMCPMC3883494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.