Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24431993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2013

Pharmacological modulation of aversive responsiveness in honey bees.

Stevanus R Tedjakumala, Margaux Aimable, Martin Giurfa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The serotonin receptor AmFrontiers in physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Visual learning in tethered bees modifies flight orientation and is impaired by epinastine.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Visuo-Motor Feedback Modulates Neural Activities in the Medulla of the Honeybee,The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Inhibitory learning of phototaxis by honeybees in a passive-avoidance task.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stevanus R TedjakumalaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR5169) Toulouse, France ; University Paul-Sabatier, Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR5169) Toulouse, France.
Margaux AimableCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR5169) Toulouse, France ; University Paul-Sabatier, Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR5169) Toulouse, France.
Martin GiurfaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR5169) Toulouse, France ; University Paul-Sabatier, Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR5169) Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within a honey bee colony, individuals performing different tasks exhibit different sensitivities to noxious stimuli. Noxious-stimulus sensitivity can be quantified in harnessed bees by measuring the sting extension response (SER) to a series of increasing voltages. Biogenic amines play a crucial role in the control of insect responsiveness. Whether or not these neurotransmitters affect the central control of aversive responsiveness, and more specifically of electric-shock responsiveness, remains unknown. Here we studied the involvement of the biogenic amines octopamine, dopamine and serotonin, and of the ecdysteroid 20-hydroxyecdisone in the central control of sting responsiveness to electric shocks. We injected pharmacological antagonists of these signaling pathways into the brain of harnessed bees and determined the effect of blocking these different forms of neurotransmission on shock responsiveness. We found that both octopamine and 20-hydroxyecdisone are dispensable for shock responsiveness while dopamine and serotonin act as down-regulators of sting responsiveness. As a consequence, antagonists of these two biogenic amines induce an increase in shock responsiveness to shocks of intermediate voltage; serotonin, can also increase non-specific responsiveness. We suggest that different classes of dopaminergic neurons exist in the bee brain and we define at least two categories: an instructive class mediating aversive labeling of conditioned stimuli in associative learning, and a global gain-control class which down-regulates responsiveness upon perception of noxious stimuli. Serotonergic signaling together with down-regulating dopaminergic signaling may play an essential role in attentional processes by suppressing responses to irrelevant, non-predictive stimuli, thereby allowing efficient behavioral performances.

Indexed as

20-hydroxyecdisoneaversive responsivenessdopaminehoney beeneuromodulationoctopamineserotoninsting extension response (SER)

Identifiers

PMID24431993
PMCPMC3882874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.