Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24431522›Full record

ArticlePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2013

Salicylic acid and salicylic acid sensitive and insensitive catalases in different genotypes of chickpea against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri.

S Gayatridevi, S K Jayalakshmi, V H Mulimani, K Sreeramulu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Salicylic Acid Induces Resistance in Rubber Tree againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S GayatrideviDepartment of Biochemistry, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, 585 106 India.
S K JayalakshmiAgricultural College, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Gulbarga, 585 103 India.
V H MulimaniDepartment of Biochemistry, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, 585 106 India.
K SreeramuluDepartment of Biochemistry, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, 585 106 India.
Gulbarga University · INUniversity of Agricultural Sciences Raichur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential expression of catalase isozymes in different genotypes of chickpea resistant genotypes- A1, JG-315, JG-11, WR-315, R1-315, Vijaya, ICCV-15017, GBS-964, GBM-10, and susceptible genotypes- JG-62, MNK, ICCV-08321, ICCV-08311, KW-104, ICCV-08123, ICC-4951, ICC-11322, ICC-08116 for wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum. f. sp. ciceri (Foc) was analyzed. Salicylic acid (SA) and H2O2 concentrations were determined in control as well as in plants infected with F. ciceri and found that the high and low levels of salicylic acid and H2O2 in resistant and susceptible genotypes of chickpea respectively. Catalase isozyme activities were detected in the gel and found that no induction of new catalases was observed in all the resistant genotypes and their some of the native catalase isozymes were inhibited; whereas, induction of multiple catalase isozymes was observed in all the screened susceptible genotypes and their activities were not inhibited upon Foc or SA treatments. The above results support the possible role of these isozymes as a marker to identify which genotype of chickpea is expressing systemic acquired resistance.

Indexed as

CatalaseChickpeaFusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceriH2O2Salicylic acid

Identifiers

PMID24431522
PMCPMC3781282
OpenAlexW1986348842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.