Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2015
Certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low to moderate activity: the CERTAIN double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00674362 (A Phase IIIB, Multi-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, 52-week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol, Administered With DMARDs, in Patients With Low to Moderate Disease Activity Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IIIB, Multi-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, 52-week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol, Administered With DMARDs, in Patients With Low to Moderate Disease Activity Rheumatoid Arthritis
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The Risk of Adverse Effects of TNF-α Inhibitors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Intensive therapy and remissions in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Pooled it
- Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis naive to methotrexate: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis unsuccessfully treated with biologics: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis in people with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) failure: a Cochrane Systematic Review and network meta-analysis (NMA).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Biologics or tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in incomplete responders to methotrexate or other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Safety Profile of Certolizumab Pegol in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drug safety · 2015Pooled it
- Effect of an Online, Interactive Lifestyle Intervention Program on 12-Month Disease Management Outcomes: Protocol for The Healthy Living in Inflammatory Arthritis (HELIA) Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Trial
- Assessment of Placebo Response in Objective and Subjective Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Adalimumab dose tapering in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are in long-standing clinical remission: results of the phase IV PREDICTRA study.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020Trial
- Effects of upadacitinib on patient-reported outcomes: results from SELECT-BEYOND, a phase 3 randomized trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate responses to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.Arthritis research & therapy · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years and the effect of tocilizumab discontinuation following sustained remission in the second and third year of the ACT-RAY study.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2015Trial
- Work productivity in Behçet syndrome.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Are seronegative patients with rheumatoid arthritis and clinically suspect arthralgia properly represented in randomized clinical trials?Clinical rheumatology · 2025Review
- Evolving strategies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a historical perspective.Reumatologia · 2025Review
- Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and herbal medicine-based therapeutic implication of rheumatoid arthritis: an overview.Inflammopharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis 52-week, randomised, double-blind phase IIIb study assessed efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) as add-on therapy to non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low to moderate disease activity, and stopping therapy in patients in sustained remission.
methodsPatients were randomised 1:1 to CZP (400 mg at weeks 0, 2 and 4, then 200 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo (every 2 weeks) plus current non-biologic DMARDs. At week 24, patients who achieved the primary endpoint of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission at both weeks 20 and 24 stopped study treatment and continued in the study until week 52.
resultsOf 194 patients (CZP=96; placebo=98), >90% had moderate disease activity at baseline. Significantly more CZP patients met the primary endpoint than placebo patients (week 20 and 24 CDAI remission rates: 18.8% vs 6.1%; p≤0.05). At week 24, 63.0% vs 29.7% of CZP versus placebo patients (p<0.001) achieved LDA. Disease activity score (ESR) based on 28-joint count and Simplified Disease Activity Index remission rates were also significantly higher with CZP versus placebo (19.8% vs 3.1%; p≤0.01 and 14.6% vs 4.1%; p≤0.05). CZP patients reported improvements in physical function versus placebo (mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability-Index change from baseline: CZP, -0.25 vs placebo, -0.03; p≤0.01). During the period following withdrawal of CZP or placebo, only 3/17 prior CZP patients and 2/6 prior placebo patients maintained CDAI remission until week 52, but CZP reinstitution allowed renewed improvement. Adverse and serious adverse event rates were comparable between CZP and placebo groups.
conclusionsAddition of CZP to non-biologic DMARDs is an effective treatment in RA patients with predominantly moderate disease activity, allowing low-disease activity or remission to be reached in a majority of the patients. However, the data suggest that CZP cannot be withdrawn in patients achieving remission. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00674362.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.