ArticleBMJ open2014
Resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study.
Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental Health and Coping in Women With ADHD During the Pandemic.Journal of attention disorders · 2026Article
- Resiliency in Child-Caregiver Dyads and the Impact on Health Outcomes in Sickle Cell Disease.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determinants of Pain-Induced Disability in German Women with Endometriosis during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Mental Health and Social Support Are Key Predictors of Resilience in German Women with Endometriosis during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The role of perceived organisational justice in the experience of pain among male and female employees.Journal of health psychology · 2022Article
- Resilience Is Associated with Less Eating Disorder Symptoms in the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Improving Patient Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Identifying Rehabilitation Pathways Based on Modifiable Psychological Risk and Resilience Factors.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies.British journal of anaesthesia · 2019Review
- Stress, Resilience, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Black Women.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2019Observational
- Psychological Flexibility as a Resilience Factor in Individuals With Chronic Pain.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Article
- Common attributes in retired professional cricketers that may enhance or hinder quality of life after retirement: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2017Article
- Explaining the Components of Resilience in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Content Analysis.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
- The Prevalence of Chronic Pain among Adults in India.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo examine 10-year mortality and hospital use among individuals categorised as resilient and vulnerable to the impact of chronic pain.
designA cohort record linkage study.
settingGrampian, Scotland.
participants5858 individuals from the Grampian Pain Cohort, established in 1996, were linked, by probability matching, with national routinely collected datasets.
main outcome measuresHRs for subsequent 10-year mortality and ORs/incidence rate ratios for subsequent 10-year hospital use, each with adjustment for potential confounding variables.
results36.5% of those with high pain intensity reported a low pain-related disability (categorised resilient) and 7.1% of those reporting low pain intensity reported a high pain-related disability (categorised vulnerable). Sex, age, housing, employment and long-term limiting illness were independently associated with being vulnerable or resilient. After adjustment for these variables, individuals in the resilient group were 25% less likely to die within 10 years of the survey compared with non-resilient individuals: HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.91 and vulnerable individuals were 45% more likely to die than non-vulnerable individuals: HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.11. Resilient individuals were less likely to have had an outpatient or day-case visit for anaesthetics: OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.79, but no other clinical specialities. Vulnerable individuals were significantly less likely to have had any outpatient or day-case visit (OR 0.43, 0.25 to 0.75); but more likely to have had a psychiatric visit (OR 1.96, 1.06 to 3.61). No significant differences in likelihood of any inpatient visits were found.
conclusionsResilient individuals have a better 10-year survival than non-resilient individuals indicating that resilience is a phenomenon worth researching. Further research is needed to explore who is likely to become resilient, why and how, as well as to tease out the internal and external factors that influence resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.