ArticleCNS drugs2014
Cranioselectivity of sumatriptan revisited: pronounced contractions to sumatriptan in small human isolated coronary artery.
Article in CNS drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical efficacy and safety of rimegepant in the treatment of migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Characterization of binding, functional activity, and contractile responses of the selective 5-HTBritish journal of pharmacology · 2019Article
- Triptans and third nerve paresis: a case series of three patients.Eye (London, England) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInitial concerns about the coronary side-effect potential of the anti-migraine drug sumatriptan and second-generation triptans initiated cranioselectivity studies using proximal human coronary arteries. However, myocardial ischaemia may originate from both large and small human coronary arteries.
methodsWe investigated the contractions to sumatriptan in proximal (internal diameter 2-3 mm), distal (internal diameter 1,000-1,500 μm) and small (internal diameter 500-1,000 μm) human epicardial coronary arteries and compared these with contractions in the human middle meningeal artery. Concentration response curves to sumatriptan in human coronary arteries were constructed in the absence or presence of the 5-hydroxytryptamine1B (5-HT1B) receptor antagonist SB224289 and the 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL15572. The effect of sumatriptan on increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels induced by forskolin in proximal and distal coronary artery segments was investigated using a biochemical assay. Western blotting was used to analyse the 5-HT1B receptor density in the human arteries.
resultsContractions in the proximal human coronary artery were significantly smaller than those in the human meningeal artery, as we showed previously. In contrast, contractions to sumatriptan in distal and small human coronary arteries were not different from those in the human meningeal artery. The 5-HT1B receptor antagonist SB224289, but not the 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL15572, inhibited the contraction induced by sumatriptan in the coronary arteries. Moreover, in distal, but not in proximal, coronary arteries, sumatriptan inhibited the increase in cAMP levels induced by forskolin. Contrary to our expectations, the 5-HT1B receptor expression was more pronounced in the proximal human coronary artery than in the distal and small human coronary artery.
conclusionsBased on functional experiments in distal and small human coronary arteries, contractions to sumatriptan are not as cranioselective as previously assumed. However, the vast clinical experience with sumatriptan and other triptans has proven that these drugs are cardiovascularly safe when contraindications are taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.