Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24430491›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2014

Creating a prosurvival phenotype through a histone deacetylase inhibitor in a lethal two-hit model.

Zhengcai Liu, Yongqing Li, Wei Chong, Danielle K Deperalta, Xiuzhen Duan, Baoling Liu, Ihab Halaweish, Peter Zhou, Hasan B Alam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Epigenetic regulation of pulmonary inflammation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  4. [A pilot study on the effects of early use of valproate sodium on neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhengcai Liu*Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; †Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an; and ‡Emergency Department, the First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China; §Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois; and ∥Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Yongqing Li
Wei Chong
Danielle K Deperalta
Xiuzhen Duan
Baoling Liu
Ihab Halaweish
Peter Zhou
Hasan B Alam
Harvard University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USAnn Arbor Center for Independent Living · USChina Medical University · CNLoyola University Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

Modulation of Acetylation in the Treatment of Lethal InjuriesR01GM084127 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALAM, HASAN B · 2009 to 2019
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHemorrhagic shock (HS) can initiate an exaggerated systemic inflammatory response and multiple organ failure, especially if followed by a subsequent inflammatory insult ("second hit"). We have recently shown that histone deacetylase inhibitors can improve survival in rodent models of HS or septic shock, individually. In the present study, we examined whether valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, could prolong survival in a rodent "two-hit" model: HS followed by septic shock from cecal ligation and puncture (CLP).

methodsMale Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) were subjected to sublethal HS (40% blood loss) and then randomly divided into two groups (n = 7/group): VPA and control. The VPA group was treated intraperitoneally with VPA (300 mg/kg in normal saline [NS], volume = 750 μL/kg). The control group was injected with 750 μL/kg NS. After 24 h, all rats received CLP followed immediately by injection of the same dose of VPA (VPA group) or NS (vehicle group). Survival was monitored for 10 days. In a parallel study, serum and peritoneal irrigation fluid from VPA- or vehicle-treated rats were collected 3, 6, and 24 h after CLP, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to analyze myeloperoxidase activity and determine tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin 6 concentrations. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of lungs at 24-h time point was performed to investigate the grade of acute lung injury.

resultsRats treated with VPA (300 mg/kg) showed significantly higher survival rates (85.7%) compared with the control (14.3%). Moreover, VPA significantly suppressed myeloperoxidase activity (marker of neutrophil-mediated oxidative damage) and inhibited levels of proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin 6 in the serum and peritoneal cavity. Meanwhile, the severity of acute lung injury was significantly reduced in VPA-treated animals.

conclusionsWe have demonstrated that VPA treatment improves survival and attenuates inflammation in a rodent two-hit model.

Indexed as

Acute Lung InjuryAnimalsAscitic FluidHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsInterleukin-6 InhibitorsMalePeroxidaseRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyShock, HemorrhagicShock, SepticTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaValproic AcidHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsInterleukin-6 InhibitorsPeroxidaseTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID24430491
PMCPMC4822203
OpenAlexW2086857869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.