Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24429628›Full record

ReviewNature2014

Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes.

Nazneen Rahman

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 360 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
360citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

360 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Germline Variation and Somatic Alterations in Ewing Sarcoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Editorial on the hereditary cancer special issue.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  8. [Genetic diagnostics].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  9. Inherited cancer syndromes in adult oncology: a referral guide based on malignant tumor and polyp features.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. SMARCAL1 is a new osteosarcoma predisposition gene.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

300 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nazneen Rahman1] Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London SW2 5NG, UK. [2] Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK A8372Cancer Research UK A9024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes in which germline mutations confer highly or moderately increased risks of cancer are called cancer predisposition genes. More than 100 of these genes have been identified, providing important scientific insights in many areas, particularly the mechanisms of cancer causation. Moreover, clinical utilization of cancer predisposition genes has had a substantial impact on diagnosis, optimized management and prevention of cancer. The recent transformative advances in DNA sequencing hold the promise of many more cancer predisposition gene discoveries, and greater and broader clinical applications. However, there is also considerable potential for incorrect inferences and inappropriate clinical applications. Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes for science and medicine will thus require careful navigation.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseCarcinogenesisGenetic Association StudiesHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsPenetrancePhysical Chromosome Mapping

Identifiers

PMID24429628
PMCPMC4975511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.