Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24428230›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation biology2014

Reactions of 5-methylcytosine cation radicals in DNA and model systems: thermal deprotonation from the 5-methyl group vs. excited state deprotonation from sugar.

Amitava Adhikary, Anil Kumar, Brian J Palmer, Andrew D Todd, Alicia N Heizer, Michael D Sevilla

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Reaction of Electrons with DNA: Radiation Damage to Radiosensitization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  3. Modulating the Catalytic Activity of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles with the Anion of the Precursor Salt.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amitava AdhikaryDepartment of Chemistry, Oakland University , Rochester, MI , USA.
Anil Kumar
Brian J Palmer
Andrew D Todd
Alicia N Heizer
Michael D Sevilla
Oakland University · US

Funding

RADIOPROTECTION OF DNA BY THIOLS--OXYGEN AND LET EFFECTSR01CA045424 · NCI · OAKLAND UNIVERSITY · PI SEVILLA, MICHAEL DOUGLAS · 1987 to 2021
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA045424NCI NIH HHS R01CA045424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study the formation and subsequent reactions of the 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine cation radical (5-Me-2'-dC•(+)) in nucleosides and DNA-oligomers and compare to one-electron oxidized thymidine. MATERIALS AND

methodsEmploying electron spin resonance (ESR), cation radical formation and its reactions were investigated in 5-Me-2'-dC, thymidine (Thd) and their derivatives, in fully double-stranded (ds) d[GC*GC*GC*GC*](2) and in the 5-Me-C/A mismatched, d[GGAC*AAGC:CCTAATCG], where C* = 5-Me-C.

resultsWe report 5-Me-2'-dC•(+) production by one-electron oxidation of 5-Me-2'-dC by Cl(2)•- via annealing in the dark at 155 K. Progressive annealing of 5-Me-2'-dC•(+) at 155 K produces the allylic radical (C-CH(2)•). However, photoexcitation of 5-Me-2'-dC•(+) by 405 nm laser or by photoflood lamp leads to only C3'• formation. Photoexcitation of N3-deprotonated thyminyl radical in Thd and its 5'-nucleotides leads to C3'• formation but not in 3'-TMP which resulted in the allylic radical (U-CH(2)•) and C5'• production. For excited 5-Me-2',3'-ddC•(+), absence of the 3'-OH group does not prevent C3'• formation. For d[GC*GC*GC*GC*](2) and d[GGAC*AAGC:CCTAATCG], intra-base paired proton transferred form of G cation radical (G(N1-H)•: C(+ H(+))) is found with no observable 5-Me-2'-dC•(+) formation. Photoexcitation of (G(N1-H)•:C(+ H(+))) in d[GC*GC*GC*GC*](2) produced only C1'• and not the expected photoproducts from 5-Me-2'-dC•(+). However, photoexcitation of (G(N1-H)•:C(+ H(+))) in d[GGAC*AAGC:CCTAATCG] led to C5'• and C1'• formation.

conclusionsC-CH(2)• formation from 5-Me-2'-dC•(+) occurs via ground state deprotonation from C5-methyl group on the base. In the excited 5-Me-2'-dC•(+) and 5-Me-2',3'-ddC•(+), spin and charge localization at C3' followed by deprotonation leads to C3'• formation. Thus, deprotonation from C3' in the excited cation radical is kinetically controlled and sugar C-H bond energies are not the only controlling factors in these deprotonations.

Indexed as

5-MethylcytosineCationsDNAElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyFree RadicalsGamma RaysModels, ChemicalProtons5-MethylcytosineCationsDNAFree RadicalsProtons5-Methylcytosinecation radicalDNA-oligomersESRHFCC valuesone-electron oxidationTD-DFT calculationsthymidine

Identifiers

PMID24428230
PMCPMC4266391
OpenAlexW2068485994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.