Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24427759›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental vaccine research2014

New vaccines against influenza virus.

Young-Tae Lee, Ki-Hye Kim, Eun-Ju Ko, Yu-Na Lee, Min-Chul Kim, Young-Man Kwon, Yinghua Tang, Min-Kyoung Cho, Youn-Jeong Lee, Sang-Moo Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Monoclonal Antibodies in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis; Efficacy and Safety.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Intranasal administration of immunogenic poly-epitope fromIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Young-Tae LeeCenter for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, and Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ki-Hye KimCenter for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, and Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eun-Ju KoCenter for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, and Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yu-Na LeeCenter for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, and Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Min-Chul KimAnimal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Anyang, Korea.
Young-Man KwonCenter for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, and Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yinghua TangCenter for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, and Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Min-Kyoung ChoCenter for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, and Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Youn-Jeong LeeAnimal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Anyang, Korea.
Sang-Moo KangCenter for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, and Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Influenza vaccines inducing broadly cross protective immunityR01AI093772 · NIAID · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KANG, SANG-MOO · 2011 to 2020
$4.2M
VLP Vaccine TechnologyR01AI105170 · NIAID · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KANG, SANG-MOO · 2013 to 2017
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093772NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI105170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is one of the most effective and cost-benefit interventions that prevent the mortality and reduce morbidity from infectious pathogens. However, the licensed influenza vaccine induces strain-specific immunity and must be updated annually based on predicted strains that will circulate in the upcoming season. Influenza virus still causes significant health problems worldwide due to the low vaccine efficacy from unexpected outbreaks of next epidemic strains or the emergence of pandemic viruses. Current influenza vaccines are based on immunity to the hemagglutinin antigen that is highly variable among different influenza viruses circulating in humans and animals. Several scientific advances have been endeavored to develop universal vaccines that will induce broad protection. Universal vaccines have been focused on regions of viral proteins that are highly conserved across different virus subtypes. The strategies of universal vaccines include the matrix 2 protein, the hemagglutinin HA2 stalk domain, and T cell-based multivalent antigens. Supplemented and/or adjuvanted vaccination in combination with universal target antigenic vaccines would have much promise. This review summarizes encouraging scientific advances in the field with a focus on novel vaccine designs.

Indexed as

M2 proteinStalk domainSupplemented vaccinationT cell immunityUniversal vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24427759
PMCPMC3890446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.