ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2013
Endoscopic management of contact point headache in patients resistant to medical treatment.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comparative Study of CT Scan and Nasal Endoscopic Findings of Lateral Wall of Nose, in Headache of Rhinogenic Origin.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- Higher incidence of headache in patients with intermittent mucosal contact points between the septum and lateral nasal wall.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2021Article
- In response to the 'Letter to the Editor' on the paper "Endoscopic surgical treatment for rhinogenic contact point headache: systematic review and meta-analysis".European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Surgical Treatment of Rhinogenic Contact Point Headache: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The existence and the best treatment for contact point headache is a controversial issue. Therefore, this study tried to evaluate the response of the patients with a rhinogenic headache who were resistant to medical treatment to endoscopic sinus surgery. Thirty patients who suffered from a unilateral headache or facial ache for at least 1 year and resistant to medical treatment were evaluated in this research. The existence of the contact point was confirmed in CT scan and in nasal endoscopy. Moreover, a positive Lidocaine test was another important factor for selecting patients. Endoscopic surgery was the common method of surgery in patients. After 1 year, the headache and nasal obstruction were assessed according to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and compared to preoperative VAS. In 30 patients who entered this research, the average headache and nasal obstruction score according to VAS was 7.4 ± 1.4 and 7.9 ± 2.5, respectively. These values consequently decreased to 4.8 ± 2.3 and 3.73 ± 1.7 1 year after surgery, respectively. The overall response rate was 93.3 % and no major complications were seen in this series. If there is strong clinical suspicion and meticulous selection criteria, provided that other causes of headache have been ruled out, endoscopic management of the rhinogenic headache can be effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.