ArticleIranian journal of pediatrics2013
Efficiency, sensitivity and specificity of automated auscultation diagnosis device for detection and discrimination of cardiac murmurs in children.
Article in Iranian journal of pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric murmur auscultation and tele-consultation: importance of signal quality and classification.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the heart sounds in children using a Doppler Phonolyser.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
- Determining the incidence of heart malformations in neonates: A novel and clinically approved solution.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease in children using a deep learning algorithm on digital stethoscope: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted auscultation in detecting congenital heart disease.European heart journal. Digital health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIntelligent electronic stethoscopes and computer-aided auscultation systems have highlighted a new era in cardiac auscultation in children. Several collaborative multidisciplinary researches in this field are performed by physicians and computer specialists. Recently, a novel medical software device, Automated Auscultation Diagnosis Device (AADD), has been reported with intelligent diagnosing ability to differentiate cardiac murmur from breath sounds in children with normal and abnormal hearts due to congenital heart disease. The aim of this study is to determine efficiency, sensitivity and specificity of the diagnoses made by this AADD in children with and without cardiac disease.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study to determine efficiency, sensitivity and specificity of diagnoses made by AADD. Our patient population was two groups of children with and without cardiac disease(563 patients and 50 normal). SPSS version 16 was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity and efficiency and descriptive analysis.
findingsUsing cardiac sound recording in four conventional cardiac areas of auscultation (including aortic, pulmonary, tricuspid and mitral), AADD proved to have a ≥90% sensitivity, specificity and efficiency for making the correct diagnosis in children with heart disease and 100% diagnostic accuracy in children with normal hearts either with or without innocent murmurs.
conclusionConsidering the high sensitivity, specificity and efficiency of AADD for making the correct diagnosis, application of this software is recommended for family physicians to enhance proper and timely patients' referral to pediatric cardiologists in order to provide better diagnostic facilities for pediatric patients who live in deprived and underserved rural areas with lack access to pediatric cardiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24427499PMC3883375W2104411224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.