Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24427348›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on right ventricular function and pulmonary circulation in patients undergone esophagectomy.

Wen-Yun Xu, Na Wang, Hai-Tao Xu, Hong-Bin Yuan, Hai-Jing Sun, Chun-Li Dun, Shuang-Qiong Zhou, Zui Zou, Xue-Yin Shi

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04998253 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial of the Effects in Oxygenation and Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction of Sevoflurane in Patient's Whit ARDS Secondary to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnidad Temporal COVID-19 en Centro CitibanamexRan2020 to 2021Enrolled24ConditionsHypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction, Hypoxemia, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 Acute Respiratory DiseaseArmsEffects in oxygenation and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction
NCT07271472 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA), Combined Intravenous-Volatile Anesthesia (CIVA), and Balanced Anesthesia (BAL) on Perioperative Oxidative Stress in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtaturk UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsVATS, Video Assisted Thoracoscopic SurgeryArmsTotal Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) Group, Balanced Anesthesia (BAL) Group, Combined Intravenous Volatile Anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wen-Yun XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Na WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hai-Tao XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Bin YuanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hai-Jing SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chun-Li DunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shuang-Qiong ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zui ZouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xue-Yin ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectSevoflurane and propofol are both widely used in clinical anesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on right ventricular function and pulmonary circulation in patients receiving esophagectomy.

methodsForty adult patients undergoing an elective open-chest thoracotomy for esophagectomy were randomized to receive either propofol (n=20) or sevoflurane (n=20) as the main anesthetic agent. The study was performed in Changzheng Hospital. Hemodynamic data were recorded at specific intervals: before the surgery (T0), BIS values reaching 40 after anesthesia induction (T1), two-lung ventilation (T2), ten minutes after one-lung ventilation (T3), the end of the operation (T4) using PiCCO2 and Swan-Ganz catheter.

resultsCI, RVEF, RVSWI and RVEDVI were significantly smaller in propofol group than those in sevoflurane group throughout the surgery (P<0.05). However, SVRI was significantly greater in propofol group than that in sevoflurane group (P<0.05). Compared with the patients in propofol group, the patients who received sevoflurane had a greater reduction in OI and increase in Os/Ot (P<0.05). And, PVRI was significantly smaller in sevoflurane group than in propofol group (P<0.05).

conclusionAnesthesia with sevoflurane preserved better right ventricular function than propofol in patients receiving esophagectomy. However, propofol improved oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation compared with sevoflurane anesthesia. To have the best effect, anesthesiologists can choose the two anesthetics flexibly according to the monitoring results.

Indexed as

AnestheticsEsophagectomyFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMethyl EthersMiddle AgedPropofolPulmonary CirculationSevofluraneVentricular Function, RightAnestheticsMethyl EthersPropofolSevofluraneesophagectomypropofolpulmonary circulationright ventricular functionSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID24427348
PMCPMC3885482
OpenAlexW1879443866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.