Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24427344›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma in adults: a clinicopathological and comparative genomic hybridization study.

Hong Zou, Xueling Kang, Li-Juan Pang, Wenhao Hu, Jin Zhao, Yan Qi, Jianming Hu, Chunxia Liu, Hongan Li, Weihua Liang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hong ZouTongji Hospital Cancer Center, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan, Hubei, China ; Department of Pathology, Shihezi University, School of Medicine Xinjiang 832002, China ; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Diseases, Ministry of Education of China Xinjiang 832002, China.
Xueling KangDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Fudan University School of Medicine Shanghai, China.
Li-Juan PangDepartment of Pathology, Shihezi University, School of Medicine Xinjiang 832002, China ; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Diseases, Ministry of Education of China Xinjiang 832002, China.
Wenhao HuDepartment of Pathology, Shihezi University, School of Medicine Xinjiang 832002, China ; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Diseases, Ministry of Education of China Xinjiang 832002, China.
Jin ZhaoTongji Hospital Cancer Center, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yan QiTongji Hospital Cancer Center, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan, Hubei, China ; Department of Pathology, Shihezi University, School of Medicine Xinjiang 832002, China ; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Diseases, Ministry of Education of China Xinjiang 832002, China.
Jianming HuDepartment of Pathology, Shihezi University, School of Medicine Xinjiang 832002, China ; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Diseases, Ministry of Education of China Xinjiang 832002, China.
Chunxia LiuTongji Hospital Cancer Center, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hongan LiDepartment of Pathology, Shihezi University, School of Medicine Xinjiang 832002, China ; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Diseases, Ministry of Education of China Xinjiang 832002, China.
Weihua LiangDepartment of Pathology, Shihezi University, School of Medicine Xinjiang 832002, China ; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Diseases, Ministry of Education of China Xinjiang 832002, China.
Xianglin YuanTongji Hospital Cancer Center, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Feng LiDepartment of Pathology, Shihezi University, School of Medicine Xinjiang 832002, China ; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Diseases, Ministry of Education of China Xinjiang 832002, China.
Shihezi University · CNTongji Hospital · CNXinjiang Medical University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study the clinicopathological and genomic characteristics of Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 RCC) in adults, we analyzed 9 Xp11.2 RCCs, confirmed by transcription factor E3 (TFE3) immunohistochemistry, in patients aged ≥20 years. TFE3 expression was also determined in 12 cases of alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) served as a positive control. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to investigate genomic imbalances in all Xp11.2 RCC cases. Most of our Xp11.2 RCC patients (5/9) presented with TNM stages 3-4, and 6 patients died 10 months to 7 years after their operation. Histologically, Xp11.2 RCC was composed of a mixed papillary nested/alveolar growth pattern (8/9). Immunostaining showed that all Xp11.2 RCC and ASPS cases had strong TFE3 expression and high positive ratios for p53 and vimentin. However, there were significant differences in the expression of AMACR (p<0.001), AE1/AE3 (p=0.002), and CD10 (p=0.024) between the 2 diseases. CGH profiles showed chromosomal imbalances in all 9 Xp11.2 RCC cases; gains were observed in chromosomes Xp11 (6/9), 7q20-25, 12q25-31 (5/9), 7p16-24 (4/9), 8p12-13, 8q20-21, 16q20-22, 17q25-26, 20q22-23 (4/9), and losses occurred frequently on chromosomes 3p12-16, 9q31-32, 14q22-24 (4/9). Our Conclusions show Xp11.2 RCC that occur in adults may be aggressive cancers, the expressions of AMACR, CD10, AE1/AE3 are helpful in the differential diagnosis between Xp11.2 RCC and ASPS, and CGH assay is a useful complementary method for confirming the diagnosis of Xp11.2 RCC.

Indexed as

Translocation, GeneticAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellChromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, XComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, Tumoralveolar soft part sarcomachromosome imbalancecomparative genomic hybridizationrenal cell carcinomaXp11.2 translocation

Identifiers

PMID24427344
PMCPMC3885478
OpenAlexW1876330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.