Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24427317›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Construction of a public CHO cell line transcript database using versatile bioinformatics analysis pipelines.

Oliver Rupp, Jennifer Becker, Karina Brinkrolf, Christina Timmermann, Nicole Borth, Alfred Pühler, Thomas Noll, Alexander Goesmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Genome Assembly and Genetic Traits of the Pleuromutilin-ProducerJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome Analyses of the Less AggressiveJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Transcriptional Changes in Potato Sprouts upon Interaction withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oliver RuppCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany ; Cell Culture Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany ; Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Jennifer BeckerCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany ; Cell Culture Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Karina BrinkrolfCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Christina TimmermannCell Culture Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Nicole BorthDepartment for Biotechnology, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Vienna, Austria ; ACIB, Austrian Center of Industrial Biotechnology, Graz and Vienna, Austria.
Alfred PühlerCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Thomas NollCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany ; Cell Culture Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Alexander GoesmannCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany ; Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines represent the most commonly used mammalian expression system for the production of therapeutic proteins. In this context, detailed knowledge of the CHO cell transcriptome might help to improve biotechnological processes conducted by specific cell lines. Nevertheless, very few assembled cDNA sequences of CHO cells were publicly released until recently, which puts a severe limitation on biotechnological research. Two extended annotation systems and web-based tools, one for browsing eukaryotic genomes (GenDBE) and one for viewing eukaryotic transcriptomes (SAMS), were established as the first step towards a publicly usable CHO cell genome/transcriptome analysis platform. This is complemented by the development of a new strategy to assemble the ca. 100 million reads, sequenced from a broad range of diverse transcripts, to a high quality CHO cell transcript set. The cDNA libraries were constructed from different CHO cell lines grown under various culture conditions and sequenced using Roche/454 and Illumina sequencing technologies in addition to sequencing reads from a previous study. Two pipelines to extend and improve the CHO cell line transcripts were established. First, de novo assemblies were carried out with the Trinity and Oases assemblers, using varying k-mer sizes. The resulting contigs were screened for potential CDS using ESTScan. Redundant contigs were filtered out using cd-hit-est. The remaining CDS contigs were re-assembled with CAP3. Second, a reference-based assembly with the TopHat/Cufflinks pipeline was performed, using the recently published draft genome sequence of CHO-K1 as reference. Additionally, the de novo contigs were mapped to the reference genome using GMAP and merged with the Cufflinks assembly using the cuffmerge software. With this approach 28,874 transcripts located on 16,492 gene loci could be assembled. Combining the results of both approaches, 65,561 transcripts were identified for CHO cell lines, which could be clustered by sequence identity into 17,598 gene clusters.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidTranscriptomeAnimalsCHO CellsComputational BiologyCricetulusHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence AnnotationTranscription, GeneticWeb Browser

Identifiers

PMID24427317
PMCPMC3888431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.