Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24427278›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Neuroimaging of reading intervention: a systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis.

Laura A Barquero, Nicole Davis, Laurie E Cutting

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reaching Students with Reading Disabilities During the Summer.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Brain's Control Networks in Reading: Insights From Cross-Task Studies of Youth.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2023
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura A BarqueroDepartment of Special Education, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Nicole DavisDepartment of Special Education, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America ; Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America ; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America ; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Laurie E CuttingDepartment of Special Education, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America ; Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America ; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America ; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America ; Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.

Funding

Visual word identification: phonology &morphologyP01HD001994 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI ZEVIN, JASON D · 1985 to 2016
$23.5M
VALITIDY OF RTI FOR IDENTIFYING READING DISABILITY BEYOND THE PRIMARY GRADESP50HD052121 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI SABATINI, JOHN P · 2006 to 2010
$8.4M
Cognitive and Neural Processes in Reading ComprehensionR01HD044073 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2004 to 2019
$8.1M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Predicting Late-Emerging RD: Neurobiological and Cognitive FactorsR01HD067254 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Neurobiology and Treatment of Reading Disability in NF1R01NS049096 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2006 to 2010
$1.9M
The neurocognition of procedural and declarative memory in dyslexia and S-RCDR21HD087088 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2016 to 2017
$434k
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD001994NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052121NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044073NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067254NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD087088NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NINDS NIH HHS NF1 7R01NS049096-05NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS049096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing number of studies examine instructional training and brain activity. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature regarding neuroimaging of reading intervention, with a particular focus on reading difficulties (RD). To locate relevant studies, searches of peer-reviewed literature were conducted using electronic databases to search for studies from the imaging modalities of fMRI and MEG (including MSI) that explored reading intervention. Of the 96 identified studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria for descriptive analysis. A subset of these (8 fMRI experiments with post-intervention data) was subjected to activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta-analysis to investigate differences in functional activation following reading intervention. Findings from the literature review suggest differences in functional activation of numerous brain regions associated with reading intervention, including bilateral inferior frontal, superior temporal, middle temporal, middle frontal, superior frontal, and postcentral gyri, as well as bilateral occipital cortex, inferior parietal lobules, thalami, and insulae. Findings from the meta-analysis indicate change in functional activation following reading intervention in the left thalamus, right insula/inferior frontal, left inferior frontal, right posterior cingulate, and left middle occipital gyri. Though these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies and the disparate methodologies used, this paper is an effort to synthesize across studies and to guide future exploration of neuroimaging and reading intervention.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingReadingBrainBrain MappingDyslexiaHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID24427278
PMCPMC3888398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.