Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24427224›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2013

A comparison study of two P300 speller paradigms for brain-computer interface.

Jiahui Pan, Yuanqing Li, Zhenghui Gu, Zhuliang Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Brain-Computer Interface: Advancement and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. [Bacomics--a new discipline integrating brain and the outside].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Fusion of Facial Expressions and EEG for Multimodal Emotion Recognition.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiahui PanSchool of Nanhai College, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510640 China.
Yuanqing LiSchool of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640 China.
Zhenghui GuSchool of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640 China.
Zhuliang YuSchool of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, a comparison of two existing P300 spellers is conducted. In the first speller, the visual stimuli of characters are presented in a single character (SC) paradigm and each button corresponding to a character flashes individually in a random order. The second speller is based on a region-based (RB) paradigm. In the first level, all characters are grouped and each button corresponding to a group flashes individually in a random order. Once a group is selected, the characters in it will appear on the flashing buttons of the second level for the selection of desired character. In a spelling experiment involving 12 subjects, higher online accuracy was obtained on the RB paradigm-based P300 speller than the SC paradigm-based P300 speller. Furthermore, we analyzed P300 detection performance, the P300 waveforms and Fisher ratios using the data collected by the two spellers. It was found that the stimuli display paradigm of the RB speller enhances P300 potential and is more suitable for P300 detection.

Indexed as

Brain–computer interface (BCI)P300ParadigmSpeller

Identifiers

PMID24427224
PMCPMC3825150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.