Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24427220›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2013

Perception of successive brief objects as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony: model experiments based on two-stage synchronization of neuronal oscillators.

Talis Bachmann, Toomas Kirt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Talis BachmannLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Public Law, University of Tartu (Tallinn Branch), Kaarli Puiestee 3, Tallinn, 10119 Estonia.
Toomas KirtLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Public Law, University of Tartu (Tallinn Branch), Kaarli Puiestee 3, Tallinn, 10119 Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently we introduced a new version of the perceptual retouch model incorporating two interactive binding operations-binding features for objects and binding the bound feature-objects with a large scale oscillatory system that acts as a mediary for the perceptual information to reach consciousness-level representation. The relative level of synchronized firing of the neurons representing the features of an object obtained after the second-stage synchronizing modulation is used as the equivalent of conscious perception of the corresponding object. Here, this model is used for simulating interaction of two successive featured objects as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). Model output reproduces typical results of mutual masking-with shortest and longest SOAs first and second object correct perception rate is comparable while with intermediate SOAs second object dominates over the first one. Additionally, with shortest SOAs misbinding of features to form illusory objects is simulated by the model.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessFeature bindingNeuronal oscillationSynchronizationVisual masking

Identifiers

PMID24427220
PMCPMC3825148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.