ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2013
Responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors within fingerpad to stimulus information for tactile softness sensation of materials.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introduction of a New In-Situ Measurement System for the Study of Touch-Feel Relevant Surface Properties.Polymers · 2020Article
- A flexible artificial intrinsic-synaptic tactile sensory organ.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Softness sensation is one of primitive tactile textures. While the psychophysical characteristics of softness sensation have been thoroughly studied, it is lack of a deep understanding of the underlying neuromechanical principles. On the stimulus-response processes of human fingerpad touching fabrics and the physiological properties of slowly adapting type I (SAIs) cutaneous mechanoreceptors within fingerpad, a fabric-skin-receptor coupling model was built and validated. By the fabric-skin-receptor model a series of numerical experiments was conducted, and how the evoked neural responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors change with the composite compliance of both fingerpad skin and the materials in contact was investigated. The results indicated that the evoked neural responses of populations of cutaneous mechanoreceptors by the physical stimulus from fabrics were nearly proportional to the perceived softness magnitude, and nonlinearly increased and then decreased with the effective elastic modulus of fabrics or the relative elastic modulus of fabrics to soft tissues within fingerpad, where the nonlinear inflection point depended on the touching force level. Therefore, it concluded that the tactile judgment of the physical information for softness sensation of objects was an encoding of neural responses of populations of SAIs cutaneous mechanoreceptors, and the physical information depended on the mechanical interaction of fingerpad and objects in contact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.