ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2013
Recovery of vesicular storage and release parameters after high frequency stimulation in rat hippocampus.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Right cerebral hemispheric sensitivity to pH and physiological ions in fixed post-mortem Wistar rat brains.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2017Article
- Is replenishment of the readily releasable pool associated with vesicular movement?Cognitive neurodynamics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The replenishment rates estimated from the recovery of synaptic efficacy following synaptic depression are known to be widely scattered. Given the importance of the replenishment during stimulation, especially if it is prolonged, it is important to better understand what influences the recovery of the synaptic efficacy following stimulation. We fit a two-pool model of vesicular secretion to the changes of the excitatory post-synaptic currents recorded in CA1 neurons of rat hippocampal slices to determine how the model parameters change during, and following, long stimulation. The replenishment rate at the end of stimulation inducing synaptic depression differs greatly from that at the beginning of stimulation. It decreases progressively and rapidly (by ~75 % and with a time constant of <10 s) during stimulation, and this is followed by a similarly fast recovery (time constant of ~10 s), but to a steady-state that is approximately twice as large as its pre-stimulation value. Both [Ca(++)]o and the duration of long stimulation influence the recovery of the replenishment rate. Its new steady-state is significantly higher, if either [Ca(++)]o is higher or stimulation longer, but the recovery of the replenishment rate becomes clearly slower if [Ca(++)]o is higher, and faster if stimulation is longer. Many factors thus influence the recovery of the replenishment rate and of the synaptic efficacy, but the stimulation induced [Ca(++)]i accumulation cannot explain the change of the replenishment rate during recovery. Finally, okadaic acid, which speeds up vesicular trafficking, does not alter the recovery of the replenishment rate. The vesicular replenishment of the RRP following stimulation is thus not likely to be associated with significant vesicular movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.