ArticleFrontiers in psychology2013
The myth of cognitive agency: subpersonal thinking as a cyclically recurring loss of mental autonomy.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neural correlates of personal goal processing during episodic future thinking and mind-wandering: An ALE meta-analysis.Human brain mapping · 2015Pooled it
- From self-organizing systems to subjective temporal extension.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- When the interoceptive and conceptual clash: The case of oppositional phenomenal self-modelling in Tourette syndrome.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024Review
- Forgetting ourselves in flow: an active inference account of flow states and how we experience ourselves within them.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- The phenomenology of attentional control: a first-person approach to contemplative science and the issue of free will.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- The sound stimulation method and EEG change analysis for development of digital therapeutics that can stimulate the nervous system: Cortical activation and drug substitution potential.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023Article
- Self-Boundary Dissolution in Meditation: A Phenomenological Investigation.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- How deep is the rift between conscious states in sleep and wakefulness? Spontaneous experience over the sleep-wake cycle.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Theoretical Perspective on an Ideomotor Brain-Computer Interface: Toward a Naturalistic and Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface Paradigm Based on Action-Effect Representation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2021Review
- The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2019Review
- Why does the mind wander?Neuroscience of consciousness · 2019Article
- Visual Perspectives in Episodic Memory and the Sense of Self.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Commentary: The myth of cognitive agency: subpersonal thinking as a cyclically recurring loss of mental autonomy.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Spontaneous Cognition and Epistemic Agency in the Cognitive Niche.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Dynamical Relations in the Self-Pattern.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?).Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Reconsidering the Mind-Wandering Reader: Predictive Processing, Probability Designs, and Enculturation.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This metatheoretical paper investigates mind wandering from the perspective of philosophy of mind. It has two central claims. The first is that, on a conceptual level, mind wandering can be fruitfully described as a specific form of mental autonomy loss. The second is that, given empirical constraints, most of what we call "conscious thought" is better analyzed as a subpersonal process that more often than not lacks crucial properties traditionally taken to be the hallmark of personal-level cognition - such as mental agency, explicit, consciously experienced goal-directedness, or availability for veto control. I claim that for roughly two thirds of our conscious life-time we do not possess mental autonomy (M-autonomy) in this sense. Empirical data from research on mind wandering and nocturnal dreaming clearly show that phenomenally represented cognitive processing is mostly an automatic, non-agentive process and that personal-level cognition is an exception rather than the rule. This raises an interesting new version of the mind-body problem: How is subpersonal cognition causally related to personal-level thought? More fine-grained phenomenological descriptions for what we called "conscious thought" in the past are needed, as well as a functional decomposition of umbrella terms like "mind wandering" into different target phenomena and a better understanding of the frequent dynamic transitions between spontaneous, task-unrelated thought and meta-awareness. In an attempt to lay some very first conceptual foundations for the now burgeoning field of research on mind wandering, the third section proposes two new criteria for individuating single episodes of mind-wandering, namely, the "self-representational blink" (SRB) and a sudden shift in the phenomenological "unit of identification" (UI). I close by specifying a list of potentially innovative research goals that could serve to establish a stronger connection between mind wandering research and philosophy of mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.