Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24426623›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of surgery2013

Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy with two port: a case of appendiceal mucocele.

Celalettin Vatansev, Gürcan Simşek, Tevfik Küçükkartallar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Celalettin VatansevDepartment of General Surgery, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey ; Selçuk Üniversitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Kliniği.Meram, Konya, Turkey.
Gürcan SimşekDepartment of General Surgery, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey ; Selçuk Üniversitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Kliniği.Meram, Konya, Turkey ; Alavardı Mahallesi Serdar Sokak No: 4/5, Konya, Turkey.
Tevfik KüçükkartallarDepartment of General Surgery, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey ; Selçuk Üniversitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Kliniği.Meram, Konya, Turkey.
Selçuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy for the neoplasm of the appendix remains a controversial subject in the literature. The main concern regarding laparoscopic treatment for the neoplasm of the appendix is incomplete resection and rupture of the tumor into the peritoneal cavity. There is a slight increase in the rate of invasion of the surgical margins in laparoscopic interventions. However, the prognosis of the neoplasm of the appendix treated with laparoscopic appendectomy is not different from an open surgical technique. A series of cases have been reported in the literature concerning the success rate of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy used in the treatment of acute appendicitis. In our clinic, two-port laparoscopic appendectomy through a single incision was successfully performed on a 45-year-old male patient diagnosed with an appendiceal mucocele. Despite some concerns in the literature about laparoscopic treatment of neoplasms of the appendix, we suggest that single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy can be successfully performed in patients diagnosed with neoplasms of the appendix.

Indexed as

Appendiceal mucoceleLaparoscopic appendectomySingle incision

Identifiers

PMID24426623
PMCPMC3693352
OpenAlexW2083295331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.