Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24426474›Full record

ReviewThe Indian journal of surgery2013

Intra Peritoneal Polypropylene Mesh and Newer Meshes in Ventral Hernia Repair: What EBM Says?

H K Ramakrishna, K Lakshman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Indian journal of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Laparoscopic modified e-tep repair of concomitant inguinal and ventral hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Does intraperitoneal mesh increase the risk of bowel obstruction? A nationwide French analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H K RamakrishnaLakshmi Nursing Home, New Bridge Road, Bhadravathi, 577301 India.
K LakshmanSagar hospital, Bangalore, India.
Dr. Hari Singh Gour University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incisional hernias and other ventral hernias are common surgical problems. It is estimated that incisional hernia complicates about 2 % to 10 % of laparotomies. Ventral and incisional hernia repairs are among the common surgeries done by a general surgeon. It is proven beyond any doubt that suture repair of these hernias should not be done as recurrence rates are unacceptably high, some series reporting as high as 54 % on long-term follow-up. A prosthetic mesh should always be used in ventral hernia repair (VHR). Now, the polypropylene mesh (PPM) has become the prosthetic mesh of choice in the repair of hernias, including inguinal hernia. However, with the advent of laparoscopic repair where the mesh is placed intraperitoneally, concerns regarding safety of PPM are raised. Newer meshes are introduced, claiming lesser complication rate. Many types of newer meshes are available now. Newer meshes are invariably costlier than PPM by 15-20 times. Is this extra cost worth? We looked in to available literature for an answer.

Indexed as

Composite meshePTFE meshIncisional hernia repairIntraperitoneal meshLaparoscopic hernia repairNewer meshesOpen hernia repairPCO meshPolypropylene mesh (PPM)PTFE meshVentral hernia repair

Identifiers

PMID24426474
PMCPMC3824771
OpenAlexW1973044058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.