Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24425937›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science and technology2013

Nutrigenomics research: a review.

V S Neeha, Priyamvadah Kinth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. [Nutrigenetics: potentials and applications in cardiovascular diseases and associated risk factors].Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Nutrition and Genetics in NAFLD: The Perfect Binomium.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Jersey steer ruminal papillae histology and nutrigenomics with diet changes.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V S NeehaNISCAIR (National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources), 14 - Satsang Vihar Marg, Spl. Institutional Area, New Delhi, 110067 India.
Priyamvadah KinthNISCAIR (National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources), 14 - Satsang Vihar Marg, Spl. Institutional Area, New Delhi, 110067 India.
National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The excitement about nutrigenomics comes from a growing awareness of the potential for modifications of food or diet to support health and reduce the risk of diet-related diseases. It is an emerging field that tends to unfold the role of nutrition on gene expression which brings together the science of bioinformatics, nutrition, molecular biology, genomics, epidemiology, and molecular medicine. The present review focuses on nutrigenomics research and to find out India's status with respect to other countries. It covers the general overview of nutrigenomics, its associated diseases, and the role of SNP in gene alteration, diet supplementation and public awareness. It is understood that with the increasing changes in the food habits and life styles, people are becoming more prone to diet related disorders. Therefore there is an urgent need to boost more research in this field to help people in understanding the relationship between diet and health, and to ensure that everyone benefits from the genomic revolution.

Indexed as

DiabetesDiet-gene interactionFood supplementNutrigenomicsNutritionObesity

Identifiers

PMID24425937
PMCPMC3602567
OpenAlexW2073198309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.