ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2014
National trends in visits to physician offices and outpatient clinics for angina 1995 to 2010.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Care Delivery in Chest Pain Patients Without an Acute Coronary Syndrome-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Decline in typical angina among patients referred for cardiac stress testing.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Changing Drivers of Mortality Among Patients Referred for Cardiac Stress Testing.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021Article
- Trends in Coded Indications for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Medicare and the Veterans Affairs After Implementation of Hospital-Level Reporting of Appropriate Use Criteria.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2021Article
- Limited Use of Outpatient Stress Testing in Young Patients With Atypical Chest Pain.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2018Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2017Review
- Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross-sectional data.Annals of internal medicine · 2014Article
- National trends in the prevalence and medical history of angina: 1988 to 2012.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe asked whether visits to physician offices and hospital outpatient clinics for angina have changed over time and whether more frequent use of certain diagnostic techniques or referrals in this setting may account for such changes. METHODS AND
resultsWe combined data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to study visits to physician offices and outpatient departments. We calculated both crude and standardized rates for these visits using a modified version of technical specifications published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. In 1995 to 1998, there were on average 3.6 million office/clinic visits each year for angina among adults in the United States. By 2007 to 2010, this had declined to 2.3 million visits each year. Angina visit rates per 100,000 declined significantly (P<0.05), with the greatest decline from 1995 through 1998 to 2003 through 2007. Coronary atherosclerotic disease diagnoses also declined after 2002. Both stress testing and referring patients out for care doubled during some study periods.
conclusionsOffice and clinic visits for angina have declined over time. This trend parallels findings for both preventable hospitalization and emergency room visits for angina. Previous research's decline in angina hospitalizations is not likely attributable to decreased referrals to hospital and emergency rooms for diagnosis and management. Although changes in International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification coding guidelines may explain some of the decline in angina and coronary atherosclerotic disease visits, it seems that other factors such as improved treatment or prevention may have played an additional role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.