Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24425106›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Wei Ping, Wei Sun, Yukun Zu, Wenshu Chen, Xiangning Fu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Hypoxia imaging withRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Hypoxia and Bone Metastatic Disease.Current osteoporosis reports · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Preclinical testing of an Atr inhibitor demonstrates improved response to standard therapies for esophageal cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Hypoxic control of metastasis.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei PingDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jie Fang Avenue, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.
Wei Sun
Yukun Zu
Wenshu Chen
Xiangning Fu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Published literatures on the prognostic value of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) overexpression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are conflicting and heterogeneous. We performed a meta-analysis to more precisely evaluate the clinicopathological and prognostic value of HIF-1α in patients with ESCC. Searches were applied to MEDLINE, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Databases until September 10, 2013, without language restrictions. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the effects. Twelve studies with 942 ESCC patients were selected to evaluate the correlation between HIF-1α and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), response to chemoradiation (RC), and clinicopathological features. HIF-1α overexpression was significantly associated with poor OS (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.41-2.24), DFS (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.15-3.18), and RC (HR 3.56, 95% CI 1.68-7.53). Besides, HIF-1α overexpression was significantly associated with stage (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.97-4.27), lymph node metastasis (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.39-2.49), depth of invasion (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.24-4.86), lymphatic invasion (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.46-3.56), distant metastasis (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.19-3.50), and vascular endothelial growth factor (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.81-7.46). Our results indicate that HIF-1α overexpression can potently predict the poor prognosis and chemoradiation resistance for ESCC. Large prospective studies with multivariable survival analyses are now needed to confirm the clinical utility of HIF-1α as an independent prognostic marker.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitPrognosisPublication BiasVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.