Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24425099›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2014

Temporal trends in phthalate exposures: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2010.

Ami R Zota, Antonia M Calafat, Tracey J Woodruff

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 299 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
299citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
33.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

299 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 571 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

239 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ami R ZotaDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Health Services, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Antonia M Calafat
Tracey J Woodruff
University of California, San Francisco · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Role of endocrine-disrupting chemicals and social stress on perinatal outcomesR00ES019881 · NIEHS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZOTA, AMI R · 2013 to 2015
$747k
Role of endocrine-disrupting chemicals and social stress on perinatal outcomesK99ES019881 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZOTA, AMI R · 2011 to 2012
$180k
NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES019881NIEHS NIH HHS K99ES019881NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES019881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhthalates are ubiquitous environmental contaminants. Because of potential adverse effects on human health, butylbenzyl phthalate [BBzP; metabolite, monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP)], di-n-butyl phthalate [DnBP; metabolite, mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP)], and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) are being replaced by substitutes including other phthalates; however, little is known about consequent trends in population-level exposures.

objectiveWe examined temporal trends in urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites in the general U.S. population and whether trends vary by sociodemographic characteristics.

methodsWe combined data on 11 phthalate metabolites for 11,071 participants from five cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2010). Percent changes and least square geometric means (LSGMs) were calculated from multivariate regression models.

resultsLSGM concentrations of monoethyl phthalate, MnBP, MBzP, and ΣDEHP metabolites decreased between 2001-2002 and 2009-2010 [percent change (95% CI): -42% (-49, -34); -17% (-23, -9); -32% (-39, -23) and -37% (-46, -26), respectively]. In contrast, LSGM concentrations of monoisobutyl phthalate, mono(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP), monocarboxyoctyl phthalate, and monocarboxynonyl phthalate (MCNP) increased over the study period [percent change (95% CI): 206% (178, 236); 25% (8, 45); 149% (102, 207); and 15% (1, 30), respectively]. Trends varied by subpopulations for certain phthalates. For example, LSGM concentrations of ΣDEHP metabolites, MCPP, and MCNP were higher in children than adults, but the gap between groups narrowed over time (pinteraction < 0.01).

conclusionsExposure of the U.S. population to phthalates has changed in the last decade. Data gaps make it difficult to explain trends, but legislative activity and advocacy campaigns by nongovernmental organizations may play a role in changing trends. CITATION: Zota AZ, Calafat AM, Woodruff TJ. 2014. Temporal trends in phthalate exposures: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2010. Environ Health Perspect 122:235-241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306681.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhthalic AcidsSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsUnited StatesEnvironmental PollutantsPhthalic Acids

Identifiers

PMID24425099
PMCPMC3948032
OpenAlexW1965283764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.